Re: No new mime types

[Eric Scheid <eric.scheid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 21/7/06 6:26 AM, "Henry Story" <henry.story@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> <link rel="categories" href="/cats"/>
> 
> which we can understand as pointing to a resource that gives a list
> of categories available to the poster, there is no need to specify
> the mime type of the representations served by </cats>. We know that
> the resource should give us a list of categories. Now if we queried
> it using application/rdf+xml we could get a list of cats using the
> atom-owl ontology [1] for example. We could also get a representation
> back in html perhaps for people who would like to browse the
> categories, the way I explain in "GET my meaning?" [2].

what if the rdf+xml resource is at one location, and the text/html is at
another, possibly even a completely different server or domain?

we can handle this today using mime types.

e.