Re: No new mime types

[Eric Scheid <eric.scheid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 21/7/06 9:05 AM, "Thomas Broyer" <t.broyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Also, I don't know much thing about RDF, but couldn't categories be
> expressed in more than one ontology? I mean, you're talking about the
> "atom owl", but couldn't there be other ones capable of representing
> categories? If the client only supports atom owl, how does it
> advertise it to the server so he get served the corresponding RDF?

For categories in particular, there is a wealth of thesauri software out
there which generate all manner of XML. Very little of which is RDF.

e.