[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: No new mime types

To: Henry Story <henry.story@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: No new mime types
From: Ian Davis <iand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:13:38 +0100
Cc: Mark Baker <distobj@xxxxxxx>, Atom-Protocol Protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <F941342F-45C3-46EA-B654-2D52C9C1B66E@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <CB132143-D1E4-49FB-AA2E-4A9757ACF316@xxxxxxxxxxx> <3f1451f50607091345q60100e65k2ddcb29b278198b5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <88A27217-576B-4612-98A5-5EF9E2C7D47F@xxxxxxxx> <AC334BC6-8A60-45E1-9F7B-30A1D3E3A28E@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c70bc85d0607201456m76f389b9ga58300d2a3ce22ce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <F941342F-45C3-46EA-B654-2D52C9C1B66E@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 3.0a1 (Windows/20060703)


On 21/07/2006 16:02, Henry Story wrote:

Now given that this spec is in xml, my question is simply: can't we justre-use application/atom+xml at least to serve those documents? Does onereally need a new mime type?

What pain are you experiencing in supporting an additional media type? Ican only see negatives to serving the two formats under the same media type.


Ian

--
http://purl.org/NET/iand
Blogging at... http://iandavis.com/blog
Working on... http://directory.talis.com/

References:
- No new mime types
  - From: Henry Story
- Re: No new mime types
  - From: Joe Gregorio
- Re: No new mime types
  - From: Mark Nottingham
- Re: No new mime types
  - From: Henry Story
- Re: No new mime types
  - From: Mark Baker
- Re: No new mime types
  - From: Henry Story

Prev by Date: Re: No new mime types
Next by Date: Re: No new mime types
Previous by thread: Re: No new mime types
Next by thread: Re: No new mime types
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread