Re: No new mime types

[Henry Story <henry.story@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 21 Jul 2006, at 17:45, James M Snell wrote:
> Not differentiating Atom entry and feed documents on the mime type  
> level
> was a mistake that I'd rather us not repeat.  It's already a problem,
> let's not make it worse.

What types of problems does this make you run into?!

I am genuinely intrigued.

(If you have a real world example that would help)

Henry


> - James
>
> Henry Story wrote:
> > Well currently both <feed> and <entry> documents can be served with
> > the"application/atom+xml" mime type. So my question is just, why  
> > not also
> > <categories> documents?
> > [snip]