On 21 Jul 2006, at 01:05, Thomas Broyer wrote:
Also, I don't know much thing about RDF, but couldn't categories be expressed in more than one ontology? I mean, you're talking about the "atom owl", but couldn't there be other ones capable of representing categories? If the client only supports atom owl, how does it advertise it to the server so he get served the corresponding RDF?
This is a really good point Thomas, so I have opened up a discussion on the Semantic Web Mailing list regarding it:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2006Jul/0062I ended up having a very good disucsion with Sean B. Palmer on #swig as summarized here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2006Jul/0066.html Henry