Re: Consensus calls

[Bill de hÓra <bill@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Tim Bray wrote:

> PaceOneAppNamespaceOnly: ACCEPTED. Up there with ExtendIntrospection for 
> having mobs of supporters.

Oh well - not a good idea to put something this changy into to the app 
namespace imo.

> PaceSlugHeader4: ACCEPTED.  Two -1's, but a lot of support and nobody's 
> saying doing it will be a calamity.

I thought I'd done enough to argue this one out elsewhere. There is one 
problem with the current text:

"""
When sent by a client in subsequent PUT requests to update the member
resource, the server MUST NOT change the atom:id of the entry or
"media link entry" and SHOULD NOT change the IRI of the resource as
well, or SHOULD put a redirection in place, most likely a 301 (Moved
Permanently).
"""

has nothing to do with the feature, I'd like leave to take it out.


> PaceSecurityConsiderations, PaceAuthenticationAndSecurity: There are 
> enough positives and negatives on both that they will remain in play.  
> The chair has asked the two authors to make any changes they want by 
> this Friday Sep 1st and the chairs will start a separate thread at that 
> time.

Is the next draft waiting on these?

cheers
Bill