[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Consensus calls
On 8/29/06, Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@xxxxxxx> wrote:
PaceAppModified2: ACCEPTED. Lots of support, only one objection.
I see two objections in the thread titled PaceAppModified2 (Sayre,
Story). I see another -1 from Broyer here:
<http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/msg06114.html>. I
didn't look any further.
Additionally, PaceAppModified2 was recommended for closure on Sam's
issues list[1], so many WG members didn't bother to comment on it.
The nature of the comments on PaceAppModified don't make it seem like
a modification of that idea is something many WG members would
welcome. Maybe put on the list again?
[1] http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/msg06239.html
--
Robert Sayre
"I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."