Re: Consensus calls

[Sylvain Hellegouarch <sh@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> PaceSlugHeader4: ACCEPTED.  Two -1's, but a lot of support and 
> nobody's saying doing it will be a calamity.
I didn't read it the same way really. I have seen many wondering the 
benefit of it in fact and also many unsure about the name of the header: 
"Slug".
> PaceRemoveMustOrderCollectionsByUpdated: REJECTED. Thank goodness we 
> don't do things by voting, because this would have been a tie.
I really don't understand the motivation behind forcing collections to 
be sorted by atom:updated. Leave publishers decide what they want to do.
> PaceNoServiceDocument: REJECTED: Sorry; there screen-full after 
> screen-full of messages, and eventually it became apparent that yes, 
> you *could* probably get along without a specialized Service doc, but 
> the idea of removing it doesn't have anything like rough-consensus 
> support.
Neither does have the idea of keeping it... anyway that doesn't bother me.

Also, what about PaceRefactorCollectionPaging?

- Sylvain