On 8/29/06, Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@xxxxxxx> wrote:
PaceUseElementsForAppCollectionTitles: Another tough one. Discussion
was intense, and very late in the day
PaceUseElementsForAppCollectionTitles2 arrived, and got some +1's.
So...
REJECTED, but... have a look at ...Titles2. Would this remove
the objections of Snell, Story, and Marvin without losing any
supporters of the original? Wouldn't take much.
Yes, using the atom:title element for titles in a collection would swing me in favor. There was some on-list concern expressed about adding a MUST reqt for atom:id to collections (also in Title2), so it might take another call to sort out. Move the atom:id reqt to a separate PACE and I'd bet it might be a slam dunk.