Re: PaceEntryMediatype

[Jan Algermissen <algermissen1971@xxxxxxx>]

On Dec 6, 2006, at 11:44 PM, James M Snell wrote:

> I certainly hope you're kidding about dropping entry docs.

Sure, yes. But your wording IMHO seemed to imply that what feed  
readers do should guide a decision. So, given they are not interested  
in the entries, dropping them is not too farfetched, is it?


> Let's just
> label 'em differently and move on.

I still do not see the use cases justifying a new media type - it  
might be the right thing to do but for the time being it looks like a  
workaround.

Jan


> - James
>
> Jan Algermissen wrote:
> > On Dec 6, 2006, at 11:30 PM, James M Snell wrote:
> >
> > > Jan Algermissen wrote:
> > > > [snip]
> > > > So they should be fixed, should they not? They seem to only have
> > > > implemented half a media type.
> > >
> > > The half they're interested in.  Why aren't they interested in  
> > > the other
> > > half?
> >
> >
> > Ha! Forget about the media type - let's drop entry documents.
> >
> > Jan
> >
> > > - James