[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 8.3.4: comma separated?! app:accept

To: atom-protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 8.3.4: comma separated?! app:accept
From: "A. Pagaltzis" <pagaltzis@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 13:41:33 +0100
In-reply-to: <45F37A82.4070009@xxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: atom-protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
References: <C219C2E5.DEA1A%eric.scheid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45F37A82.4070009@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

* James M Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx> [2007-03-11 04:50]:
> Having implemented it, I respectfully disagree. There's zero
> additional complexity. I have running code that demonstrates
> that there is zero additional complexity.

Having implemented microparsing in XSLT, I disagree that there
isn’t additional complexity.

Regards,
-- 
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 8.3.4: comma separated?! app:accept
  - From: James M Snell

References:
- Re: 8.3.4: comma separated?! app:accept
  - From: Eric Scheid
- Re: 8.3.4: comma separated?! app:accept
  - From: James M Snell

Prev by Date: Re: Statically named resources and PUT
Next by Date: Re: Editorial section 9.3: updating
Previous by thread: Re: 8.3.4: comma separated?! app:accept
Next by thread: Re: 8.3.4: comma separated?! app:accept
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread