Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-14.txt

[James M Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx>]

Elliotte Harold wrote:
> [snip]
> Clearly PUT is underspecified. There are very different understandings
> of it amongst the community.
> 
> I have proposed several changes, and I think at a *minimum* we need the
> following changes to section 9.3:
> 
> 1. Change "update" to "store" in accordance with RFC 2616 language.
> Other verbs may be preferable to store, but update is just wrong.
> 

+0. I agree that perhaps there needs to be some clarification but I'm
not sure if changing the verb will do that.

> 2. Change "all metadata that has not been intentionally modified" to
> "all markup and content that has not been intentionally modified"
> 

+1

> 3. Provide examples as we do in section 9.2 and 9.5.
> 

+1

- James