Re: Suggest slight change in description of Slug

[Nikunj Mehta <nikunj.mehta@xxxxxxxxxx>]

A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> *grmf* And then I went and accidentally dropped the specific
> qualification from the text. What I meant is, of course, this:
>
>     Slug is an HTTP entity-header whose presence in a POST to a
>     Collection constitutes a request by the client to use the
>     header value as part of the URI normally used to retrieve the
>     to-be-created Member Resource.
>
> Regards,
>   

We define Slug as an "entiy-header" that is only present in a POST 
request, and has no meaning elsewhere. Doesn't that make it a request 
header? If so, it must be clearly stated as such. §5.3 of RFC 2616 
clearly states that

   ...[N]ew or experimental header fields MAY be given the semantics of
   request-header fields if all parties in the communication recognize
   them to be request-header fields.