[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Securing the Atom Publishing Protocol (yes, sorry, we're not done here)

To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Securing the Atom Publishing Protocol (yes, sorry, we're not done here)
From: "Joe Gregorio" <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 16:56:12 -0400
Cc: "Tim Bray" <Tim.Bray@xxxxxxx>, Atom-Protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=I2xGAJzwFD0szaJG8/f3aKzqANYop5LhqIe8oTHGJb0QsJ3oLaVxMlJSBINpY11zheRdf1QneWZZRJS1LVB/L7Z5DaLtbXQUvKv+ZALwfw80X4Xl87S+fWdG2VimOShBe+aDSe4v2vwaCONJzFwn6gsSvjjLlFQOTgZveF604FY=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=YgOhrt1bhRvOeRa54ImrGrywuZ4WSlmZJPXfKuImjPRzQzYty+/fZAL5KOD+ihP7Yg2Ya1aSa7CNPU6tgZ255wMXcescFMMovnDRE5heNxYikarDeOED3dV1KUrA30x3M86+/miMYWxrE+Sr4pl0V+P7WBk8io7FyRv8lCTwiHs=
In-reply-to: <464C67E0.1020202@xxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <464C4FB5.1020303@xxxxxx> <4E3426EF-43E1-4B8B-A34B-72FB15ECC623@xxxxxxx> <464C67E0.1020202@xxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx


On 5/17/07, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@xxxxxx> wrote:

+1.

If the IESG wants us to put specific text into that section, they really
should be able to state what it means.


Agreed, and until then, it will remain unchanged.

  Thanks,
  -joe

--
Joe Gregorio        http://bitworking.org

References:
- Securing the Atom Publishing Protocol (yes, sorry, we're not done here)
  - From: Julian Reschke
- Re: Securing the Atom Publishing Protocol (yes, sorry, we're not done here)
  - From: Tim Bray
- Re: Securing the Atom Publishing Protocol (yes, sorry, we're not done here)
  - From: Julian Reschke

Prev by Date: Re: 10.2 Collection Member Resource
Next by Date: Re: More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17)
Previous by thread: Re: Securing the Atom Publishing Protocol (yes, sorry, we're not done here)
Next by thread: More comments on pre-draft (as of 2007-05-17)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread