Re: Status of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-15.txt

To: "Paul Hoffman" <phoffman@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Status of draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-15.txt
From: "Joe Gregorio" <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:54:09 -0400
Cc: atom-protocol@xxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=SOKlSBuNSbMaJ6E0owavn6hWhSilOjqO62S5i/D+rSxVzS1aHBG6UL3EKXlcYDbtw3fun4xiuRk23EKiDlcJFyQ5EIPUf6Arw7gMDWiw8OU5kF3z5a/hE9be+vZwS1lX5woCkEATzQHeiyU10kVYXAqh8yv3h6oFKXvg7O4ynj4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=XGkh5P74U3YJrNC4DHsxPSBcLTSn8P7X/gkaFALOmLv+wKsvAUTIC7d798kopSSc8BOz0RUEILgu+FWwp1i0xVGtLflqS3+QVYmwFwO7rQ0scsXDj3UHPcxrCNpp1VHsAuZ5kRpFw/gtUDUjSnD/se1Sx9Tc1z44Yvz2LYoKgDw=
In-reply-to: <p06240871c29630314ff2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <p06240871c29630314ff2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx


On 6/13/07, Paul Hoffman <phoffman@xxxxxxx> wrote:


Greetings again. Acting as document shepherd, I have been collecting
all of the must-do items for the APP document.


Just to clarify, we are producing a -16 draft with these changes?

Does this wording change work for the WG?


Yes.

   -joe

--
Joe Gregorio        http://bitworking.org