Sometime in August would likely work for us.
- James
Tim Bray wrote:
>
> Well, we've got our namespace, and I think that while we may be
asked to
> give more guidance on security and trade-offs and so on, the actual
> design of the Atom Publishing Protocol is now finished. That last
> interop event was awfully useful and I'm wondering whether maybe we
> shouldn't take another whack at it. Everyone's had time to
incorporate
> the lessons of the last go-around, implement various more authent
> schemes, and so on. Forewarned, we can make sure we have some sort of
> network in place where all our computers can talk to each other
> directly. I'd hope that this time, we'd have a shot at getting a
nice
> clean check-mark in every grid square.
>
> It would probably be most efficient to do it in the Bay Area once
> again. Maybe in early August? -Tim
>
>