A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Sylvain Hellegouarch <sh@xxxxxxxxxx> [2007-06-20 11:40]:would reflect the fact that the community pushes hard to use AtomPP as the default name of the protocol rather than "app".Sadly, I don’t think such consensus exists. Most people keep calling it APP, despite the drawbacks. There are a number of advocates who’ve picked up the AtomPP coinage, but it’s not exactly universal. This isn’t surprising; the spec pushes “APP” throughout and a lot of people therefore stick with that.
I thought the spec reflected consensus rather than pushed an acronym. Editing that is not a big deal, assuming people can agree what the abbreviation should be.
cheers Bill