[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP

To: Joe Gregorio <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP
From: James M Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:54:43 -0700
Cc: Yaron Goland <yarong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "atom-protocol@xxxxxxx" <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IE/3rXHOrY5wYw0k5vbQdTrLdnkgiy1s+yzL5PmvqyHpc1D4Fje9lP+4Hv5TtvikPEPebLzZzKsLEYNqNiA3YrGsAIQbK+pscTI3sxfA049y0Nr9xugBARD0DSzuUHJGI/vp1PhsHhjf0lTKpuZRhNvXEonNPO59zVgC8u6ceHY=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=U8yGR2EVOG/Lyw/owpQ1c47Pg8QKZGQDPnrB9Kl4E0ZH9K2nlVd6Sop60SfqHmAFg1Ch6o3kutKxM3QEGss+TLiLRPMqPm9MYbMLfx63ka2I/HnQPIRANoKb309cbMiL6VO/xtYPnquYJfT9diAMMb11MvRlNbe9fuyNnl8//Jg=
In-reply-to: <3f1451f50706202012u4fe03354i41f9983cac2ea81f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <AE9A8CBCE1A9744D975A9FBBF822DD784DE1536BE5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3f1451f50706202012u4fe03354i41f9983cac2ea81f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326)

Well put.

- James

Joe Gregorio wrote:
> 
> On 6/20/07, Yaron Goland <yarong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Section 9.1.1 of RFC 2616 defines what safe and unsafe methods
>> are and specifically defines PUT as unsafe. My understanding of the
>> term unsafe in RFC 2616 is that when a client issues an unsafe method
>> they take personal responsibility for the content of the method and
>> its reasonably understood side effects.
> 
> Does your browser stop you from using HTML forms that
> have hidden controls? Or do you inspect the source of every
> HTML form you use and refuse to press OK until you understand what
> each hidden control does?
> 
>   -joe
>

References:
- Question about section 9.3 of APP
  - From: Yaron Goland
- Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP
  - From: Joe Gregorio

Prev by Date: Re: Can we make Atom:Author, Atom:Title, Atom:Summary, Atom:updated and Atom:id optional?
Previous by thread: Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP
Next by thread: Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread