RE: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM

[Yaron Goland <yarong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks to everyone for taking the time to listen and respond. I am sorry that things started off in such a messy way. I honestly believe that Dare's intentions were good but he may not have expressed himself in an optimal way.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: joe.gregorio@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:joe.gregorio@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Joe Gregorio
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 12:31 PM
> To: Sylvain Hellegouarch
> Cc: Tim Bray; Yaron Goland; atom-protocol@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in
> ATOM
>
> On 6/21/07, Sylvain Hellegouarch <sh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > After reading all of Yaron's messages there's not much we can argue
> > about really. As Tim points out, the structure Windows Live seems to
> be
> > using is so far from what Atom can do that I can understand why
> Yaron's
> > team didn't choose Atom and AtomPub in the first place. Tim is also
> > right that the way things have been brought in the first place were
> > certainly not the best way to approach that fact. Enough said I guess
> :)
>
> +1
>
> > Thanks to Yaron for taking some time with his emails though.
>
> Agreed. Thanks Yaron.
>
>    -joe
>
> --
> Joe Gregorio        http://bitworking.org