[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track

To: atom-protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track
From: Eric Scheid <eric.scheid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 00:49:45 +1000
In-reply-to: <46C5AAEB.6050805@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.1.2418

On 18/8/07 12:04 AM, "Andreas Sewe" <sewe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> required (MUST utilize extension, extension processed)
> supported (extension processed)
> unsupported (extension not processed)
> prohibited (MUST NOT utilize extension, extension not processed)

+1

e.

References:
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track
  - From: Andreas Sewe

Prev by Date: Re: Reject Duplicate Member (with response 409?)
Previous by thread: Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track
Next by thread: Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread