[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: -1 on features draft

To: atom-protocol Protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: -1 on features draft
From: "A. Pagaltzis" <pagaltzis@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:43:21 +0200
In-reply-to: <3f1451f50709110852g5bcbc3cam3c3333adb32895dc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: atom-protocol Protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
References: <3f1451f50709110852g5bcbc3cam3c3333adb32895dc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

* Joe Gregorio <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2007-09-11 18:10]:
> AtomPub is not a mustUnderstand protocol, and this features
> draft will not change that fact.

mod_atom REQUIRES If-Match on PUT. Clients which do ETag-less
updates will fail to interoperate.

Is Tim in violation of RFC 2616 or Atompub?

Regards,
-- 
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>

References:
- -1 on features draft
  - From: Joe Gregorio

Prev by Date: Re: -1 on features draft
Previous by thread: Re: -1 on features draft
Next by thread: Breakdown of features
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread