Re: -1 on the features draft

[James M Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx>]

Bill de hOra wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> I'd be better swayed by a concrete example of how you would imagine
>> these alternative approaches working with Atompub.
> 
> If you want me to change my position, fix your spec. The onus is not on
> me to provide a better design.
> 

Heh, this is fun. If you think the spec needs to be fixed, it would help
to have a concrete example of what you'd consider "fixed".  At this
point, I have zero idea what changes you'd like to see.  If you do not
wish or intend to offer anything concrete, even just a strawman example
to illustrate the point, there's nothing I can do to "fix" it and this
entire thread has been pointless.

- James