[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Google data service document
- To: "Sylvain Hellegouarch" <sh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Google data service document
- From: "Joe Gregorio" <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:54:42 -0500
- Cc: atom-protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=JrUs9gZ6qVRqUqqpeQ/9NNTS+MZ0dKwTXV9S3YZV+ks=; b=Coq+Uci0T706mLkhWc2R9n5iNE2JRiwKn+cy88pTf23VDXPvu1KNFpeFzjJK8iVf8p7T9UJaEfeTsa2sEQnSvDxMBPHyG8XlIv78bm2eAiSzvXJ5btM8FwBy9Loyfo8XbBqDx9BSe0vEcRwuU2r2I1sGDMDXGk2iHnc2UfXT+II=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=cBgHJ+KX28gf0xWjW207SaR0mMP50U7KEYFWFn7s5p1M3rJGmcl3X6vwghfsDNYIEqi7OoRHyAQ7TUzYoPFaY/VKdxupD4mPViWik8lAXCxaHzXDYHDkc7eCidVlruhfVzxulTRTzzyE0T/dnUEnZBu+iJ2jyr3vWJYulRK78fU=
- In-reply-to: <475FBA7A.10109@xxxxxxxxxx>
- List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
- List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
- References: <475FBA7A.10109@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Dec 12, 2007 5:39 AM, Sylvain Hellegouarch <sh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I was playing with the GData interface using httplib2 and had good fun.
> However I was surprised to realize that there was no mention in the
> documentation (nor anywhere else AFAIK) of a service document for the
> different GData services.
>
> Seems awkward to me considering the benefit of that document for
> discovery of services, has anyone an idea if it can be found by some
> kind of voodoo magic?
I don't believe the locations of the service document is documented anywhere.
Even if you had found it you would have noticed that it's in the wrong
namespace, being based on the -09 draft.
Our current GData implementations aren't completely RFC 5023
compliant, but there
is an effort underway to bring them all up to speed. We brought a
preview of that work to
the last interop session and we did quite well. I'll obviously be
writing more about this as each
service goes live with a compliant version of AtomPub.
Thanks,
-joe
--
Joe Gregorio http://bitworking.org