Re: POST for an exisiting id?

["Dirk Haun" <dirk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thomas Broyer wrote:

>Some implementations overwrite atom:ids (i.e. they don't trust what
>they're sent), but that's certainly not a must: you're free to use the
>provided atom:id and/or then reject duplicates with a 4xx.

Yeah, I know. We're already taking some liberties with the IDs
(filtering out characters we don't allow in an ID).

When I switch to ignoring the provided ID completely, the APE goes ahead
and creates three entries successfully and the test now passes.

I still think the APE's behaviour here is a little odd, but at least it
doesn't seem to be problem on our side.

Thanks!

bye, Dirk


-- 
http://www.geeklog.net/