[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Reviving the features draft?

To: "Jan Algermissen" <algermissen1971@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Reviving the features draft?
From: "Teo Hui Ming" <teohuiming.work@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 22:21:16 +0800
Cc: "Brian Smith" <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "atom-protocol Protocol" <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=/qsNOBIHFhNbGQ58qMf7B4d1m5TU3w8VsaEndMztTVQ=; b=xpExdliuaxey0Xf3IuHm6kKQMffqQOVhUP69IhSbuvABjiTMhnYQOl8rSAyKGlXCW0/3rQDqXo8IZSF6lzKYRPCde/S+yRc7uV+cwTKPVZpRija53KDKQpKL6JHU3kMTav4Nhk29OlFylikGM0MhmdsaWSXXXd2xWK/qWq1l/t0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hmwiA9EkIiXQxYJPc471j0cf+siO1kKTc7KkiJi+RWcdL9Pk//ld8uU+SZ7j4KivBh0M/iv/VjkPzpIwEe0jPF5hehh8fx1YUT046sHid5eXzXL3gWrR+7GaLCTxtYG0r3zgJPFFOU/OHyfDQBSrhusaxHjrhszHDxjJyYafNUE=
In-reply-to: <5A8CA6E8-10B1-45E7-815C-BDEF59FFD4CE@xxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <C593D24B-F7AA-48A6-901C-32F036F5AD62@xxxxxxx> <> <52689C3D-6BF2-4BD9-8548-C8432FFD4DEE@xxxxxxx> <> <5A8CA6E8-10B1-45E7-815C-BDEF59FFD4CE@xxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Jan Algermissen
<algermissen1971@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>  The semantics are different! The nearest equivalent to what I need would be
>
> > <app:collection href='http://example.org/collection'>
> >     <link rel='rdf:type'
> >           href='http://example.org/orderProcessor/>
> >  </app:collection>
> >

Interesting. in your use case, is it true that
app:categories/atom:category can't be used to differentiate between
collection?

-- 
Teo Hui Ming

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Reviving the features draft?
  - From: Jan Algermissen

References:
- Reviving the features draft?
  - From: Jan Algermissen
- RE: Reviving the features draft?
  - From: Brian Smith
- Re: Reviving the features draft?
  - From: Jan Algermissen
- RE: Reviving the features draft?
  - From: Brian Smith
- Re: Reviving the features draft?
  - From: Jan Algermissen

Prev by Date: Re: Reviving the features draft?
Next by Date: Re: Reviving the features draft?
Previous by thread: Re: Reviving the features draft?
Next by thread: Re: Reviving the features draft?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread