[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: rel="discuss"



2008/5/9 Eric Scheid <eric.scheid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On 9/5/08 1:30 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> hmmm ... but we do have link@type to differentiate, no?
>
> There is not always a MIME type associated with or accessible at a URI.
> What is the MIME type for an IRC channel or an email discussion list?

Good point. Will these link@rel=discuss be pointing directly at the
discussion forum, or to a gateway/informational page? What is the URI of an
email discussion list?

Yeah, interesting...for a mailing list there are at least three possibilities - mailto: URI, info page, URI for direct posting to list over HTTP.

The latter two should be able to describe themselves to any agent that goes looking - @type is redundant (though useful). I suppose with mailto: the URI scheme plays a similar role to the media type with HTTP URIs. I don't know of any neat machine-friendly way of saying "don't dereference this with http" beyond parsing out the scheme. But maybe that's not a problem -  if the mailto: is displayed as a link in a browser then the browser will typically do what's expected; any machine-oriented agent which might want to go dereferencing should have the smarts not to go chasing mailto:s.

As far as I'm aware the situation is the same for other forum schemes/protocols.

Cheers,
Danny.


--
http://dannyayers.com
~
http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/this_weeks_semantic_web/