Re: Collection Mirrors

[Aristotle Pagaltzis <pagaltzis@xxxxxx>]

* James M Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx> [2008-05-15 05:30]:
> Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
>> Yes, that’s how I’d do it – provide the parametrisation via an
>> extension attribute to atom:link that can be used to convey
>> geographic information.
>
> I hadn't pursued it because I did not detect a lot of interest
> at the time, but I've toyed with the idea of a x:link-template
> extension element modeled after atom:link but using URI
> Templates, e.g.
>
>   <x:link template rel="..."
>                    pattern="http://example/{foo}";
>                    title="..." />
>
> Child elements can be used to describe the parameters if
> necessary.

That’s nothing to do with what I’m talking about. I meant that
the *relation* is parametrised by the geographic location info,
not the link: “Resource `$foo` is an `alternate` for the current
resource (oh and btw, it’s `geo:located` in `jp`).”

Regards,
-- 
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>