Re: Draft-gregorio-atompub-multipart on the standards track?

[Peter Keane <pkeane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The folks on the AtomPub repository team at UT Austin (daseproject.org)
are all for it moving ahead. We intend to implement this functionality
in the next rev.
 
--peter keane

On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 06:13:43PM -0400, Joe Gregorio wrote:
> 
> I'm really happy about the great feedback and the amount of
> interest there has been in draft-gregorio-atompub-multipart-00.
> What does everyone think of moving this forward on the standards track?
> 
> (Obviously there are details to work out, about whether or not we need
> to spin up a new WG (we might not), and determining consensus, etc, but
> for now I would just like to conduct a little straw poll to see how many
> people think this is worth pursuing.)
> 
>    Thanks,
>    -joe
> 
> -- 
> Joe Gregorio http://bitworking.org