atompub-multipart-01 consensus process

[Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@xxxxxxx>]

On Jun 17, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Joe Gregorio wrote:

> The latest draft is now available:
>
>   http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gregorio-atompub-multipart-01.txt

OK, since I agreed to be the consensus shepherd on this one, I propose  
the following.  Let's allow till July 7 (2 weeks plus the Canada/US  
early-july holidays) for discussion.  There are two kinds of consensus  
in play: First, whether the IETF should bless something substantially  
like this at all, and second, if so, whether further changes are  
required.   On the first one, my observation so far would that there  
is pretty good basic consensus, so any fundamental opposition should  
be early and loud.  On the second, I don't think we need to require  
Paces, but change proposals should nonetheless constitute specific  
edits to the language in multipart-01.

 -Tim