QNames in content, was: rdf in atom

[Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@xxxxxx>]

Mark Nottingham wrote:
> On 02/07/2008, at 6:58 AM, Bill de hOra wrote:
>
> > 1: QNames in content:
> >
> > "The at:map element indicates how an element in a given context 
> > (either feed or entry, depending on use) maps to RDF statements.  Its 
> > content MUST be an XML QName, and indicates the element that is being 
> > mapped."
> >
> > that's more or less a bug from my pov.
>
> I'm not a big fan either. I think this is the part of the spec that 
> needs most discussion; e.g., I can imagine that XPath may be more useful 
> ultimately, given things like atom:author. The counter-argument to that 
> is that keeping it simple encourages simple Atom extensions, which are 
> IMO good.
> ...

The QName-in-content problem could be easily avoided by saying

   <at:map property="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title";>
     <atom:title/>
   </at:map>

instead of

   <at:map
    property="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title";>atom:title</at:map>

Or am I missing something here?

BR, Julian