[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Resources for AtomPub parser validation

To: "Atom-Protocol Protocol" <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Resources for AtomPub parser validation
From: "Thomas Broyer" <t.broyer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 19:26:24 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=qgGN/+mlPc+d68FUFQM0gCoikRcJCFDbNNnQjM6f+QY=; b=HtnnCKwI3kgFotRjZ/IVp3lOEi6QkyCmveYULVSEif25IQtCAN7B0VA0JOEdlkgxBu 6rL+IQY2sV8tZq0s/+dOKEHNvT2GobIIsaE0Lzbc42+S1rmlqd/4TxZnMFHOoK6XP51/ WtFiEzVFEyhoLkFXoxIPKgBH12UjqXUp9MpUM=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=V9zFTFv/w7xTtQ6IbACHqoDK1c2vWjZJFkvjFjfG/FWyB9vN91YDG2w2yzKiYRWGk7 Yceq3t9jIi0pIA/oidpBZUFJfph+5ZitYtNfNdt+asNfTBuFOoy6JBzlvpkfwdq7eVxX KUd4NsXJTcmkjYRC7yRUkkGzyz1iLkmGb8pwU=
In-reply-to: <20080703162644.GN29229@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <98A9B259-1CCF-47CE-8BC0-BD9E4371F12F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <79C229B8-AC6D-47C8-9F67-2C2376F705A4@xxxxxxx> <F2BC0E78-E4B0-41E0-AFC2-4E5DDEEF47B9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <80190124-0215-4B32-AC92-AABFCF000282@xxxxxxx> <BAY141-DAV59313BC3B552A007EFFCFBE9F0@xxxxxxx> <20080703153819.GC29792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <a9699fd20807030909h692169cfxc198ee51670b3816@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080703162644.GN29229@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
>
>> > which requires no monkeying with any XML/SGML/HTML escape
>> > mechanism at all.
>>
>> ...except if you use an ampersand in a value...
>>
>>     foo?bar=baz&copy;baz=quux
>
>    foo?bar=baz%C2%A9;baz=quux
>
> Pretty much no reason to ever have a literal ampersand in a URI.

I actually meant:

    foo?bar=baz%26copy;baz=quux

or in an (X)HTML/XML context:

    foo?bar=baz&amp;copy;baz=quux


-- 
Thomas Broyer

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Resources for AtomPub parser validation
  - From: Aristotle Pagaltzis

References:
- Resources for AtomPub parser validation
  - From: Daniel Jalkut
- Re: Resources for AtomPub parser validation
  - From: Tim Bray
- Re: Resources for AtomPub parser validation
  - From: Daniel Jalkut
- Re: Resources for AtomPub parser validation
  - From: Tim Bray
- Re: Resources for AtomPub parser validation
  - From: James Holderness
- Re: Resources for AtomPub parser validation
  - From: Aristotle Pagaltzis
- Re: Resources for AtomPub parser validation
  - From: Thomas Broyer
- Re: Resources for AtomPub parser validation
  - From: Aristotle Pagaltzis

Prev by Date: Re: Resources for AtomPub parser validation
Next by Date: Re: Resources for AtomPub parser validation
Previous by thread: Re: Resources for AtomPub parser validation
Next by thread: Re: Resources for AtomPub parser validation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread