[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Should AtomPub allow app:categories in workspace?
- To: Atom Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>, atom-protocol@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Should AtomPub allow app:categories in workspace?
- From: Ian Mayo <ianmayo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:37:22 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ODtZS6vw4pE4Vnh1FrY7DYN7df7ggsksSbozSVhVVS0=; b=xa/7YZfh+HUyKU9LtvGRJDwjdj4+75SPCFCBkaiF88Z295PHZ389QiQ+fqwz5pgnU5 Ch178XZ2lgWgffEQjC94ibMadqWIpKr0WLuf0adVo2GtwIJrif5xk5keSQARYJyiM1fn A95hA1B+vFF/9IILb8c/lzmzcYHa0BxRGhEnE=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=TNL6POEaKuCsmPHZbsHnjZ/a9ym2/MMJLOsq0rCGO8kWdaNrDs+Xhh9OUKs9WQvD6Z rie/kDihRvZBGfVaWe/3Hfahpdp7nSUMEJJJRmtRW/GZtD4EMH9s1HktvofDVBK3OTvC Mkiud/KjSI3nje52Zjj1Z9d6gt27w1wDq9Lb8=
- List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
- List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
- Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi all,
there seems to be a mismatch between the Atom Syndication Format and
the Atom Publication Protocol.
Maybe there are lots, but I've stumbled across this one.
ASF (4.2.2) says:
The "atom:category" element conveys information about a category
associated with an entry or feed.
Categories the are available for an entry are specified in a
categories element in the parent collection/feed. Thus, if a category
is available for association with a feed, it's categories descriptor
should be specified in the parent element, a workspace in this case.
But, APP (8.3.6) says:
The "app:categories" element provides a list of the categories that
can be applied to the members of a Collection.
I'd appreciate clarification on whether I'm interpreting the documents
correctly,
cheers,
Ian