[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atompub-hierarchy-00

To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@xxxxxx>, "'Nikunj Mehta'" <nikunj.mehta@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atompub-hierarchy-00
From: "Brian Smith" <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 08:28:02 -0500
Cc: "'atom-protocol Protocol'" <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>, "'Colm Divilly'" <colm.divilly@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4A015FDD.8000701@xxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <20090505163954.118983A6A6F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5DCCB462-183A-4C2F-A86E-C08EAE6057DC@xxxxxxxxxx> <4A015FDD.8000701@xxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcnOMi8PAUr+4xu3Sgy3+exGDT+Z7QAHDrjg

Julian Reschke wrote:
> Nikunj Mehta wrote:
> > We would like to solicit the group's feedback on this I-D. There is
> > already some interest both internally at Oracle and from other
> parties
> > in advancing this I-D along standards track.
> > ...
> 
> I note that there is overlap with the AtomPub bindings in CMIS (see
> <http://www.oasis-
> open.org/committees/download.php/32171/Draft%2061.zip>),
> and I think it would be totally great if we could find out whether a
> single set of extensions would be sufficient.

+1

References:
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atompub-hierarchy-00
  - From: Nikunj Mehta
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atompub-hierarchy-00
  - From: Julian Reschke

Prev by Date: Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atompub-hierarchy-00
Previous by thread: Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atompub-hierarchy-00
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread