Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atompub-hierarchy-00

[Peter Keane <pkeane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:01 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Nikunj Mehta wrote:
>>
>> We would like to solicit the group's feedback on this I-D. There is
>> already some interest both internally at Oracle and from other parties in
>> advancing this I-D along standards track.
>> ...
>
> I note that there is overlap with the AtomPub bindings in CMIS (see
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/32171/Draft%2061.zip>),
> and I think it would be totally great if we could find out whether a single
> set of extensions would be sufficient.
>

While I see some overlap, it seems like the use cases are quite
different (hierarchy in CMIS is just a small part of a much larger
goal).  I see some overlap in a couple of link@rels and it seems the
'h:role' extension in hierarchy-ID is analogous to 'type' in CMIS.  I
could see some benefit in harmonizing names where that makes sense.

CMIS new link relation types:
parents
repository
children
descendents
allowableactions
allversions
latestversion
relationships
type
source
target
stream
policies
pwc

CMIS entry types:
type
document
folder
relationship
policy
(also two new mime types: for query doc & allowable actions doc)

hierarchy-ID new link relation types:
master
detail

hierarchy-ID entry types:
h:role=master
h:role=detail

(happy to be corrected if I got any of that wrong)

--peter keane




> BR, Julian
>
>