Re: A 'proposal' to extend application/atomsrv+xml towards a universal service document format

To: Jan Algermissen <algermissen1971@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: A 'proposal' to extend application/atomsrv+xml towards a universal service document format
From: Colm Divilly <colm.divilly@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:17:37 +0000
Cc: atom-protocol Protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1C2D7CA2-A5B3-408E-B424-50D3240E9A0D@xxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Organization: Oracle Corporation
References: <1C2D7CA2-A5B3-408E-B424-50D3240E9A0D@xxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)




On 22/01/2010 13:38, Jan Algermissen wrote:


I think that application/atomsrv+xml

that should be application/atomsvc+xml

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A 'proposal' to extend application/atomsrv+xml towards a universal service document format
  - From: Jan Algermissen

References:
- A 'proposal' to extend application/atomsrv+xml towards a universal service document format
  - From: Jan Algermissen