[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A 'proposal' to extend application/atomsrv+xml towards a universal service document format

To: Colm Divilly <colm.divilly@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: A 'proposal' to extend application/atomsrv+xml towards a universal service document format
From: Jan Algermissen <algermissen1971@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:48:21 +0100
Cc: atom-protocol Protocol <atom-protocol@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4B59C191.6020208@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-protocol.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-protocol-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <1C2D7CA2-A5B3-408E-B424-50D3240E9A0D@xxxxxxx> <4B59C191.6020208@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx



On Jan 22, 2010, at 4:17 PM, Colm Divilly wrote:




On 22/01/2010 13:38, Jan Algermissen wrote:


I think that application/atomsrv+xml

that should be application/atomsvc+xml


Doh - thanks.

Jan


-----------------------------------
 Jan Algermissen, Consultant

 Mail: algermissen@xxxxxxx
 Blog: http://www.nordsc.com/blog/
 Work: http://www.nordsc.com/
-----------------------------------

References:
- A 'proposal' to extend application/atomsrv+xml towards a universal service document format
  - From: Jan Algermissen
- Re: A 'proposal' to extend application/atomsrv+xml towards a universal service document format
  - From: Colm Divilly

Prev by Date: Re: A 'proposal' to extend application/atomsrv+xml towards a universal service document format
Previous by thread: Re: A 'proposal' to extend application/atomsrv+xml towards a universal service document format
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread