Archive of atom-protocol, by thread
Go to date index
Go to main page for atom-protocol
Page 3 of 23
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
- RE: Discovery of APP service documents, (continued)
- [Fwd: Less drafty: RFC 2617 for OAuth],
John Panzer
- [Fwd: Really early draft: RFC 2617 for OAuth],
John Panzer
- app:edited seems to be optional but the ape thinks it's required,
Michael Wechner
- 'onetime' Service Document for reliable POST,
Teo Hui Ming
- Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds,
Nikunj Mehta
- Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds,
Thomas Broyer
- Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds,
Nikunj Mehta
- Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds,
Thomas Broyer
- Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds,
James Holderness
- Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds,
Daniel E. Renfer
- Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds,
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds,
James M Snell
- Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds,
Eric Larson
- Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds,
James M Snell
- Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds,
Joe Gregorio
- Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds,
James M Snell
- Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds,
Joe Gregorio
- Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds,
Nikunj Mehta
- Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds,
Joe Gregorio
- Re: Possibly contrary statements in Atompub and feed history I-Ds,
Nikunj Mehta
- Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Lisa Dusseault
- RE: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Joe Cheng
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
James Snell
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Andreas Sewe
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Eric Scheid
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Sylvain Hellegouarch
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Sylvain Hellegouarch
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Sylvain Hellegouarch
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
James M Snell
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
James M Snell
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
James M Snell
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
James M Snell
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
James M Snell
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Joshua E Cook
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
James M Snell
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Julian Reschke
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Julian Reschke
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Joshua E Cook
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
James M Snell
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Eric Scheid
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
James M Snell
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Eric Scheid
- RE: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Joe Cheng
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
A. Pagaltzis
- RE: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Joe Cheng
- RE: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Joe Cheng
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Bill de hOra
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
James M Snell
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Bill de hOra
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Bill de hOra
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
James M Snell
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Eric Larson
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
James M Snell
- RE: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Joe Cheng
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Bill de hOra
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
James M Snell
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Tim Bray
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
James M Snell
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
John Panzer
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Andreas Sewe
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
James M Snell
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
James Holderness
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
James M Snell
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Andreas Sewe
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
James M Snell
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Eric Scheid
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
James M Snell
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Eric Scheid
- RE: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Brian Smith
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Eric Scheid
- RE: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features onStandards Track,
Brian Smith
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Nikunj Mehta
- Re: Judging consensus for publishing Atompub-features on Standards Track,
Dave
- Reject Duplicate Member (with response 409?),
Teo Hui Ming
- ETag and Media Resources,
Alex Milowski
- Interop testing report,
Tim Bray
- Partial updates recapitulated,
John Panzer
- tests for today,
Joe Cheng
- Online APP Interop tomorrow (Monday) afternoon,
Tim Bray
- Which category scheme(s) to support?,
Joe Cheng
- Editorial nit in draft-17,
Tim Bray
- Weird <content src= values in APP,
Tim Bray
- lost update detection and DELETE,
Joe Cheng
- Re: lost update detection and DELETE,
Tim Bray
- RE: lost update detection and DELETE,
Joe Cheng
- Re: lost update detection and DELETE,
Tim Bray
- Re: lost update detection and DELETE,
Roy T. Fielding
- RE: lost update detection and DELETE,
Joe Cheng
- Re: lost update detection and DELETE,
Sylvain Hellegouarch
- Re: lost update detection and DELETE,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: lost update detection and DELETE,
Sylvain Hellegouarch
- Re: lost update detection and DELETE,
Julian Reschke
- Re: lost update detection and DELETE,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: lost update detection and DELETE,
Thomas Broyer
- Re: lost update detection and DELETE,
Julian Reschke
- Re: lost update detection and DELETE,
Tim Bray
- Re: lost update detection and DELETE,
Roy T. Fielding
- Re: lost update detection and DELETE,
Roy T. Fielding
- September Atompub interop?,
Nikunj Mehta
- Today's news...,
Tim Bray
- Features Draft - Unofficial Last Call,
James M Snell
- APP FAQ,
Tim Bray
- [no subject],
Sylvain Hellegouarch
- Newbie question about PUT for create...,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Collection feed paging implementations,
Sylvain Hellegouarch
- Slug is a write-only value?,
Daniel Jalkut
- [ANN] Atomic Client 0.8.0 Available,
Alex Milowski
- Conflicting text and production for atom:title in app:collection,
Andreas Wuest
- multipart posts,
James M Snell
- Re: multipart posts,
Bill de hOra
- RE: multipart posts,
Joe Cheng
- Re: multipart posts,
Tim Bray
- Re: multipart posts,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: multipart posts,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: multipart posts,
James M Snell
- RE: multipart posts,
Joe Cheng
- Re: multipart posts,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: multipart posts,
Thomas Broyer
- Re: multipart posts,
John Panzer
- Re: multipart posts,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: multipart posts,
Thomas Broyer
- Re: multipart posts,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: multipart posts,
Thomas Broyer
- Re: multipart posts,
James M Snell
- Re: multipart posts,
Mark Baker
- Re: multipart posts,
Kyle Marvin
- Re: multipart posts,
James M Snell
- Re: multipart posts,
Bill de hOra
- Re: multipart posts,
James M Snell
- Re: multipart posts,
James Holderness
- Re: multipart posts,
James M Snell
- Re: multipart posts,
Thomas Broyer
- Re: multipart posts,
James M Snell
- Re: multipart posts,
John Panzer
- Re: multipart posts,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: multipart posts,
A. Pagaltzis
- Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-17.txt,
Joe Gregorio
- Atom, AtomPub and ATE as a schematron schema,
Sylvain Hellegouarch
- Any Example site to Test APP,
Deepak Kukrety
- Critical mass for Aug 6-7?,
Tim Bray
- Re: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?,
Sylvain Hellegouarch
- Re: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?,
Kyle Marvin
- Re: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?,
Sylvain Hellegouarch
- Re: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?,
Keith Fahlgren
- Re: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?,
James M Snell
- RE: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?,
Joe Cheng
- Re: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?,
M. David Peterson
- RE: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?,
Joe Cheng
- Re: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?,
M. David Peterson
- Re: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?,
M. David Peterson
- Re: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?,
Tim Bray
- Re: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?,
A. Pagaltzis
- RE: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?,
Joe Cheng
- Re: Critical mass for Aug 6-7?,
John Panzer
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-16.txt,
James M Snell
- Accept-Put... just a thought,
James M Snell
- Entry Resources, Media Link Entries and Resources,
Antonio Tapiador del Dujo
- Interop in Tokyo,
ASAKURA Hiroshi
- Interop Aug. 6-7?,
Tim Bray
- Up-to-date client?,
Tim Bray
- Semantics of collections; how to model this operation?,
John Panzer
- app:accept shortcoming,
Sylvain Hellegouarch
- Going to turn the switch,
Tim Bray
- HTTP BoF at IETF Chicago,
Mark Nottingham
- Interpretation re Media Link Entries & Member Resources,
Tim Bray
- PATCH draft,
James M Snell
- The rest of the Security Considerations issues,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues,
James M Snell
- Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues,
James M Snell
- Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues,
John Panzer
- Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues,
James M Snell
- Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues,
James M Snell
- Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues,
Sylvain Hellegouarch
- Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues,
Sylvain Hellegouarch
- Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues,
Tim Bray
- Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues,
Tim Bray
- Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues,
James M Snell
- Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues,
Paul Hoffman
- Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues,
Bill de hOra
- Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues,
Tim Bray
- Re: The rest of the Security Considerations issues,
Julian Reschke
- Question about section 9.3 of APP,
Yaron Goland
- RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
Houghton,Andrew
- Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
James M Snell
- Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
Joe Gregorio
- Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
Tim Bray
- RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
Yaron Goland
- Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
Joe Gregorio
- RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
Yaron Goland
- Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
John Panzer
- RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
Joe Cheng
- Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
James M Snell
- RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
Joe Cheng
- RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
Joe Cheng
- Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
A. Pagaltzis
- RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
Joe Cheng
- Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
Bill de hOra
- RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
Yaron Goland
- Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
John Panzer
- Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
Tim Bray
- Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
Tim Bray
- Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
Tim Bray
- Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
Henry Story
- RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
Yaron Goland
- Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
Henry Story
- RE: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
Yaron Goland
- Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
Stefan Eissing
- Re: Question about section 9.3 of APP,
Bill de hOra
- Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM,
Yaron Goland
- Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM,
James M Snell
- Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM,
Tim Bray
- Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM,
Sylvain Hellegouarch
- RE: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM,
Yaron Goland
- Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM,
James M Snell
- RE: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM,
Yaron Goland
- Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM,
John Panzer
- Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM,
James M Snell
- RE: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM,
Yaron Goland
- Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM,
James M Snell
- RE: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM,
Yaron Goland
- Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM,
James M Snell
- Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM,
A. Pagaltzis
- Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM,
Bill de hOra
- Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM,
John Panzer
- Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM,
Lisa Dusseault
- Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM,
John Panzer
- Re: Hierarchy - Part 2 - How we think our data would look in ATOM,
Bill de hOra
- Hierarchy - Part 1 - Why we care so much about it,
Yaron Goland
- Can we make Atom:Author, Atom:Title, Atom:Summary, Atom:updated and Atom:id optional?,
Yaron Goland
- Re: Can we make Atom:Author, Atom:Title, Atom:Summary, Atom:updated and Atom:id optional?,
Nikunj Mehta
- Re: Can we make Atom:Author, Atom:Title, Atom:Summary, Atom:updated and Atom:id optional?,
Brendan Taylor
- Re: Can we make Atom:Author, Atom:Title, Atom:Summary, Atom:updated and Atom:id optional?,
James M Snell
- Re: Can we make Atom:Author, Atom:Title, Atom:Summary, Atom:updated and Atom:id optional?,
Tim Bray
- Is it just us?,
Yaron Goland
- [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-snell-atompub-feature-05.txt],
James M Snell
- Socially engineering the protocol name.,
Matt Harmon
- Entities in XHTML,
Joe Cheng
- Features Draft - versioning features?,
Jan Algermissen
- Atom protocol and digital signatures,
Sam Hartman
Page 3 of 23
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail
Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections
to this Web page, please send them to
phoffman@imc.org.