Archive of atom-syntax, by date

Go to thread index
Go to main page for atom-syntax

Page 43 of 44
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

XSDs and C#, Randy Charles Morin, 10/01/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Sjoerd Visscher, 10/01/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Dave Pawson, 09/30/2003
Re: Ordered/unordered in Atom schema, Sam Ruby, 09/30/2003
Re: Alternative <content>?, Seairth Jacobs, 09/30/2003
RE: Ordered/unordered in Atom schema, Randy Charles Morin, 09/30/2003
Re: Alternative <content>?, Henri Sivonen, 09/30/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, James Aylett, 09/29/2003
Alternative <content>?, Seairth Jacobs, 09/29/2003
RE: Atom's double life?, Danny Ayers, 09/29/2003
RE: Atom's double life?, Danny Ayers, 09/29/2003
RE: Atom's double life?, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 09/29/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, James Aylett, 09/29/2003
RE: Atom's double life?, Danny Ayers, 09/29/2003
RE: Atom's double life?, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 09/29/2003
Re: Progress, James Aylett, 09/27/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, James Aylett, 09/27/2003
Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Tim Bray, 09/26/2003
Progress, Gary F, 09/26/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Ken MacLeod, 09/26/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Henri Sivonen, 09/26/2003
Re: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom], Bill Kearney, 09/26/2003
Re: OT: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom], Dave Winer, 09/26/2003
Re: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom], Gary F, 09/26/2003
[OT] (really really OT) RE: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom], Danny Ayers, 09/26/2003
Re: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom], James Aylett, 09/26/2003
Re: OT: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom], Sam Ruby, 09/26/2003
RE: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom], Asbjørn Ulsberg, 09/26/2003
RE: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 09/26/2003
RE: OT: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom], Danny Ayers, 09/26/2003
RE: Feed enclosures, Danny Ayers, 09/26/2003
RE: Feed enclosures, Danny Ayers, 09/26/2003
Re: OT: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom], Stefan Tilkov, 09/26/2003
Re: OT: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom], Maciej Ceglowski, 09/25/2003
Re: OT: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom], Maciej Ceglowski, 09/25/2003
Re: OT: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom], Sean B. Palmer, 09/25/2003
Re: OT: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom], Sean B. Palmer, 09/25/2003
Re: OT: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom], James Robertson, 09/25/2003
Re: OT: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom], Morbus Iff, 09/25/2003
Re: OT: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom], Dare Obasanjo, 09/25/2003
OT: its [Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom], Evan Martin, 09/25/2003
RE: Feed enclosures, Dare Obasanjo, 09/25/2003
RE: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Dave Pawson, 09/25/2003
Re: Feed enclosures, Kevin Marks, 09/25/2003
RE: Feed enclosures, Danny Ayers, 09/25/2003
Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Dean Allen, 09/25/2003
Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Aaron Swartz, 09/25/2003
RE: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 09/25/2003
Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Joe Gregorio, 09/25/2003
Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Bill de hÓra, 09/25/2003
Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Morbus Iff, 09/25/2003
Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Dave Winer, 09/25/2003
Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Morbus Iff, 09/25/2003
Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Dave Winer, 09/25/2003
RE: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Morbus Iff, 09/25/2003
Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Maciej Ceglowski, 09/25/2003
Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Gary F, 09/25/2003
Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Singing Banzo, 09/25/2003
Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Maciej Ceglowski, 09/25/2003
RE: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 09/25/2003
RE: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Danny Ayers, 09/25/2003
Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Sean B. Palmer, 09/24/2003
RE: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Jeremy Gray, 09/24/2003
Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Lucas Thompson, 09/24/2003
Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Maciej Ceglowski, 09/24/2003
Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Aaron Swartz, 09/24/2003
'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom, Morbus Iff, 09/24/2003
Re: Feed enclosures, Dave Winer, 09/24/2003
Re: Feed enclosures, Morbus Iff, 09/24/2003
Re: Feed enclosures, Dave Winer, 09/24/2003
Re: Feed enclosures, Bill Kearney, 09/24/2003
Re: Trolls (was RE: Atom's double life?), Phil Wolff, 09/24/2003
Re: Feed enclosures, Dave Winer, 09/24/2003
Re: Feed enclosures, Tim Bray, 09/24/2003
Re: Feed enclosures, Morbus Iff, 09/24/2003
RE: Trial Balloon: optional <backlink> element, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 09/24/2003
Re: content-type "textile", Joe Gregorio, 09/24/2003
Re: content-type "textile", Seairth Jacobs, 09/24/2003
Re: Feed enclosures, Ken MacLeod, 09/24/2003
Re: content-type "textile", Dean Allen, 09/24/2003
Re: Feed enclosures, Morbus Iff, 09/24/2003
Re: Last n posts, Dare Obasanjo, 09/24/2003
Re: Feed enclosures, Jason Brome, 09/24/2003
Re: Feed enclosures, Morbus Iff, 09/24/2003
Re: Feed enclosures, Dave Winer, 09/24/2003
Re: Feed enclosures, James Robertson, 09/24/2003
Re: Feed enclosures, Morbus Iff, 09/24/2003
Re: Feed enclosures, Dave Winer, 09/24/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Seairth Jacobs, 09/24/2003
RE: Feed enclosures, Danny Ayers, 09/24/2003
Re: Feed enclosures, James Aylett, 09/24/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, James Aylett, 09/24/2003
Re: Feed enclosures, Dave Winer, 09/24/2003
RE: Feed enclosures, Danny Ayers, 09/24/2003
Re: Feed enclosures, Dave Winer, 09/24/2003
Feed attachments, Danny Ayers, 09/24/2003
Re: Last n posts, Dave Pawson, 09/24/2003
Re: Trial Balloon: optional <backlink> element, Dave Pawson, 09/24/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Dave Pawson, 09/24/2003
Re: Last n posts, James Aylett, 09/23/2003
Re: Trial Balloon: optional <backlink> element, James Aylett, 09/23/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, James Aylett, 09/23/2003
Trolls (was RE: Atom's double life?), Danny Ayers, 09/23/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Bill Humphries, 09/23/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Dave Pawson, 09/23/2003
Re: Trial Balloon: optional <backlink> element, Dave Pawson, 09/23/2003
Last n posts, Dave Pawson, 09/23/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, James Aylett, 09/23/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Dave Pawson, 09/23/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, David Jacobs, 09/23/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Dave Winer, 09/23/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, James Robertson, 09/23/2003
RE: Trial Balloon: optional <backlink> element, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 09/23/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Gary F, 09/23/2003
Related content [was: optional <backlink> element], Sam Ruby, 09/23/2003
Re: Trial Balloon: optional <backlink> element, James Aylett, 09/23/2003
RE: Trial Balloon: optional <backlink> element, Danny Ayers, 09/23/2003
RE: Atom's double life?, Danny Ayers, 09/23/2003
Re: Trial Balloon: optional <backlink> element, Bill Humphries, 09/22/2003
Re: Trial Balloon: optional <backlink> element, Sam Ruby, 09/22/2003
Re: Trial Balloon: optional <backlink> element, Dare Obasanjo, 09/22/2003
Re: Trial Balloon: optional <backlink> element, Joe Gregorio, 09/22/2003
Re: Trial Balloon: optional <backlink> element, Sam Ruby, 09/22/2003
Re: Trial Balloon: optional <backlink> element, Dare Obasanjo, 09/22/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Tim Bray, 09/22/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Joe Gregorio, 09/22/2003
Trial Balloon: optional <backlink> element, Sam Ruby, 09/22/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Bill Kearney, 09/22/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Dare Obasanjo, 09/22/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Dave Winer, 09/22/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Ken MacLeod, 09/22/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Dave Winer, 09/22/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Bill Kearney, 09/22/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Bill Kearney, 09/22/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Dave Winer, 09/22/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Dare Obasanjo, 09/22/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Sam Ruby, 09/22/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Mark Pilgrim, 09/22/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Dare Obasanjo, 09/22/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Mark Pilgrim, 09/22/2003
Re: Atom's double life?, Dare Obasanjo, 09/22/2003
Atom's double life?, Seairth Jacobs, 09/22/2003
Re: Atom-start-range and Atom-end-range are not so great ideas either, Joe Gregorio, 09/20/2003
Re: Atom/CSS question, Tim Bray, 09/19/2003
RE: Atom/CSS question, Dave Pawson, 09/19/2003
RE: Atom/CSS question, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 09/19/2003
Atom/CSS question, David Jacobs, 09/18/2003
introspection and search-results implemented into Lenya, Michael Wechner, 09/11/2003
[wxAtomClientApp] Summary, Michael Wechner, 09/11/2003
Re: Updating Entry 205?, Michael Wechner, 09/11/2003
Updating Entry 205?, Michael Wechner, 09/11/2003
Re: CSS, Aaron Swartz, 09/11/2003
Atom Authentication passwords, David Raynes, 09/10/2003
Re: CSS, Henri Sivonen, 09/03/2003
Re: xml:lang must not be required [was Re: xml:lang attribute], Sérgio, 09/01/2003
Re: xml:lang must not be required [was Re: xml:lang attribute], Bill Kearney, 08/30/2003
OSCOM @ Seybold SF is confirmed, Michael Wechner, 08/29/2003
RE: OSCOM @ Seybold SF, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/29/2003
Re: OSCOM @ Seybold SF, Michael Wechner, 08/28/2003
Re: OSCOM @ Seybold SF, Tim Bray, 08/28/2003
OSCOM @ Seybold SF, Michael Wechner, 08/28/2003
RE: CSS, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/28/2003
Re: CSS, Aaron Swartz, 08/27/2003
Re: CSS, Aaron Swartz, 08/27/2003
Re: CSS, Graham, 08/27/2003
RE: CSS, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/27/2003
RE: Syndicating CSS?, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/27/2003
Re: Syndicating CSS?, Arve Bersvendsen, 08/27/2003
Re: CSS, David Jacobs, 08/26/2003
Re: CSS, Maciej Cegłowski, 08/26/2003
RE: CSS, Morbus Iff, 08/26/2003
RE: CSS, Danny Ayers, 08/26/2003
Re: CSS, Aaron Swartz, 08/26/2003
RE: Syndicating CSS?, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/26/2003
RE: CSS, Nelson Minar, 08/26/2003
RE: doh, 0.2 multipart again, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/26/2003
Re: doh, 0.2 multipart again, Sam Ruby, 08/26/2003
Re: doh, 0.2 multipart again, Bill de hÓra, 08/26/2003
Announce: Revised MetaWeblog API spec, Dave Winer, 08/26/2003
Extensibility now! (was RE: CSS), Danny Ayers, 08/26/2003
RE: doh, 0.2 multipart again, Danny Ayers, 08/26/2003
Re: xml:lang must not be required [was Re: xml:lang attribute], Evan Martin, 08/26/2003
RE: CSS, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/26/2003
RE: xml:lang must not be required [was Re: xml:lang attribute], Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/26/2003
RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/26/2003
RE: Ordered/unordered in Atom schema, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/26/2003
Re: doh, 0.2 multipart again, Ken MacLeod, 08/25/2003
Re: doh, 0.2 multipart again, Sam Ruby, 08/25/2003
Atom-start-range and Atom-end-range are not so great ideas either, Sam Ruby, 08/25/2003
RE: doh, 0.2 multipart again, Danny Ayers, 08/25/2003
Re: doh, 0.2 multipart again, Tim Bray, 08/25/2003
RE: Ordered/unordered in Atom schema, Danny Ayers, 08/25/2003
RE: Ordered/unordered in Atom schema, Dare Obasanjo, 08/25/2003
RE: CSS, Nelson Minar, 08/25/2003
Re: Atom-all is a bad idea, Nelson Minar, 08/25/2003
RE: Ordered/unordered in Atom schema, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/25/2003
Re: doh, 0.2 multipart again, Ken MacLeod, 08/25/2003
RE: more 0.2 <generator> gripes, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/25/2003
RE: lang must not be required [was Re: xml:lang attribute], Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/25/2003
Re: xml:lang must not be required [was Re: xml:lang attribute], Arve Bersvendsen, 08/25/2003
Re: format-00, Graham, 08/25/2003
RE: doh, 0.2 multipart again, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/25/2003
RE: CSS, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/25/2003
RE: xml:lang must not be required [was Re: xml:lang attribute], Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/25/2003
Re: CSS, Simon Willison, 08/25/2003
Re: doh, 0.2 multipart again, Mark Pilgrim, 08/25/2003
RE: doh, 0.2 multipart again, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/25/2003
RE: CSS, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/25/2003
RE: Atom 0.2 feedback, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/25/2003
RE: Atom 0.2 feedback, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/25/2003
RE: format-00: 3.1.9 "atom:generator" Element, Danny Ayers, 08/25/2003
Re: Atom-all is a bad idea, Joe Gregorio, 08/24/2003
Re: Atom-all is a bad idea, Sam Ruby, 08/24/2003
Re: Atom-all is a bad idea, Joe Gregorio, 08/24/2003
Atom-all is a bad idea, Sam Ruby, 08/24/2003
Re: format-00: 3.1.9 "atom:generator" Element, Ken MacLeod, 08/24/2003
Re: Atom 0.2 feedback, Ken MacLeod, 08/24/2003
RE: format-00: 3.1.9 "atom:generator" Element, Danny Ayers, 08/24/2003
Re: Atom 0.2 feedback, Bill de hÓra, 08/24/2003
format-00: 3.1.9 "atom:generator" Element, Ken MacLeod, 08/24/2003
format-00: feeds or extensible set of entities?, Ken MacLeod, 08/24/2003
Ziv's Metadata Rule, Ziv Caspi, 08/23/2003
Re: xml:lang must not be required [was Re: xml:lang attribute], Maciej Ceglowski, 08/22/2003
Re: xml:lang must not be required [was Re: xml:lang attribute], Arve Bersvendsen, 08/22/2003
Re: xml:lang must not be required [was Re: xml:lang attribute], Evan Martin, 08/22/2003
Re: xml:lang must not be required [was Re: xml:lang attribute], Arve Bersvendsen, 08/22/2003
RE: lang must not be required [was Re: xml:lang attribute], Danny Ayers, 08/22/2003
RE: Ordered/unordered in Atom schema, Danny Ayers, 08/22/2003
RE: Atom 0.2 feedback, Danny Ayers, 08/22/2003
Re: Atom 0.2 feedback, Ken MacLeod, 08/22/2003
xml:lang must not be required [was Re: xml:lang attribute], Evan Martin, 08/22/2003
Re: Atom 0.2 feedback, Tim Bray, 08/22/2003
Ordered/unordered in Atom schema, Tim Bray, 08/22/2003
Re: Atom 0.2 feedback, Bill Kearney, 08/22/2003
RE: Atom 0.2 feedback, Danny Ayers, 08/22/2003
RE: Atom 0.2 schemas, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/22/2003
RE: Atom 0.2 feedback, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/22/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Bill Kearney, 08/22/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Graham Parks, 08/22/2003
RE: 0.2 question re content of <content>, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/22/2003
Re: Atom 0.2 feedback, Sam Ruby, 08/22/2003
RE: xml:lang attribute, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/22/2003
RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Danny Ayers, 08/22/2003
RE: Atom 0.2 feedback, J. Scott Johnson, 08/22/2003
RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/22/2003
RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/22/2003
RE: Atom 0.2 feedback, Ziv Caspi, 08/22/2003
RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/22/2003
RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/22/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Duncan Wilcox, 08/21/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Graham Parks, 08/21/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Bill Kearney, 08/21/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Bill Kearney, 08/21/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Sam Ruby, 08/21/2003
RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Danny Ayers, 08/21/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Sam Ruby, 08/21/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Graham Parks, 08/21/2003
RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Danny Ayers, 08/21/2003
complaints addr when unparseable (Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Tom Myers, 08/21/2003
RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Jeremy Gray, 08/21/2003
RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Jeremy Gray, 08/21/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Graham Parks, 08/21/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Sam Ruby, 08/21/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Graham Parks, 08/21/2003
RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/21/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Sam Ruby, 08/20/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Bill de hÓra, 08/20/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Tim Bray, 08/20/2003
RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/20/2003
RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/20/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Dare Obasanjo, 08/20/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Sam Ruby, 08/20/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Anatoly Vorobey, 08/20/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Bill Kearney, 08/20/2003
When Validated Lies Like a Rug ... And **can** this be fixed ?, J. Scott Johnson, 08/20/2003
RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Danny Ayers, 08/20/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Sam Ruby, 08/20/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Dare Obasanjo, 08/19/2003
Re: Atom error-handling, Dare Obasanjo, 08/19/2003
Atom error-handling, Tim Bray, 08/19/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Aaron Swartz, 08/19/2003
Re: comments on Atom 0.2, Aaron Swartz, 08/19/2003
Re: Syndicating CSS?, Evan Martin, 08/19/2003
Re: Syndicating CSS?, Dare Obasanjo, 08/19/2003
summary markup (Re: Atom 0.2 feedback, Tom Myers, 08/19/2003
Syndicating CSS?, Phil Wolff, 08/19/2003
Re: Atom 0.2 feedback, Sam Ruby, 08/19/2003
Re: Escaped vs. inline content permathread (was Re: Atom 0.2 feedback), Graham Parks, 08/19/2003
Escaped vs. inline content permathread (was Re: Atom 0.2 feedback), Mark Pilgrim, 08/19/2003
Re: Atom 0.2 feedback, Simon Willison, 08/19/2003
Re: Atom 0.2 feedback, Dare Obasanjo, 08/19/2003
Re: Atom 0.2 feedback, Graham Parks, 08/19/2003
Re: Atom 0.2 feedback, J. Scott Johnson, 08/19/2003
Re: Atom 0.2 feedback, Tim Bray, 08/19/2003
Re: Atom 0.2 feedback, Tim Bray, 08/19/2003
RE: Atom 0.2 feedback, Danny Ayers, 08/19/2003
Re: Atom 0.2 feedback, Mark Pilgrim, 08/19/2003
Re: Atom 0.2 feedback, Sam Ruby, 08/19/2003
Re: Atom 0.2 feedback, Tim Bray, 08/19/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Tom Myers, 08/19/2003
RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Grant Carpenter, 08/19/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Joe English, 08/19/2003
Re: Atom 0.2 feedback, Joe Gregorio, 08/19/2003
Re: Atom 0.2 feedback, Rodent of Unusual Size, 08/19/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Simon Willison, 08/19/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Maciej Ceglowski, 08/19/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Ken MacLeod, 08/19/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Graham Parks, 08/19/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Tom Myers, 08/19/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Bill Kearney, 08/19/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Graham Parks, 08/19/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Bill Kearney, 08/19/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Evan Martin, 08/19/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Bill Kearney, 08/19/2003
Re: xml:lang attribute, Bill Kearney, 08/19/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Bill Kearney, 08/19/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Nelson Minar, 08/19/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Aaron Swartz, 08/19/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Bill Kearney, 08/19/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Sam Ruby, 08/19/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Graham Parks, 08/19/2003
RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Danny Ayers, 08/19/2003
Re: Atom 0.2 feedback, Sam Ruby, 08/19/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Sam Ruby, 08/19/2003
RE: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Danny Ayers, 08/19/2003
Re: For shame! (was problem: PHP can't deal with Atom-Authenticate headers), Joe Gregorio, 08/19/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Bill Kearney, 08/19/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Bill Kearney, 08/19/2003
Re: Atom API problem: PHP can't deal with Atom-Authenticate headers, Dirk Haun, 08/19/2003
Re: Atom API problem: PHP can't deal with Atom-Authenticate headers, kellan, 08/18/2003
Re: For shame! (was problem: PHP can't deal with Atom-Authenticate headers), Aaron Swartz, 08/18/2003
For shame! (was problem: PHP can't deal with Atom-Authenticate headers), Sam Ruby, 08/18/2003
Re: AtomAPI Implementation, Joe Gregorio, 08/18/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Graham Parks, 08/18/2003
Re: Atom API problem: PHP can't deal with Atom-Authenticate headers, Joe Gregorio, 08/18/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Aaron Swartz, 08/18/2003
Re: Atom 0.2 schemas, Aaron Swartz, 08/18/2003
more 0.2 <generator> gripes, Tim Bray, 08/18/2003
Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Nelson Minar, 08/18/2003
Re: Atom API problem: PHP can't deal with Atom-Authenticate headers, Simon Willison, 08/18/2003
Re: Atom API problem: PHP can't deal with Atom-Authenticate headers, Ken MacLeod, 08/18/2003
Re: Atom API problem: PHP can't deal with Atom-Authenticate headers, Bill de hÓra, 08/18/2003
Re: Atom API problem: PHP can't deal with Atom-Authenticate headers, Simon Willison, 08/18/2003
Re: doh, 0.2 multipart again, Zhang Yining, 08/18/2003
Re: Atom API problem: PHP can't deal with Atom-Authenticate headers, J. Scott Johnson, 08/18/2003
Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?, Simon Willison, 08/18/2003
doh, 0.2 multipart again, Tim Bray, 08/18/2003
Atom 0.2 schemas, Tim Bray, 08/18/2003
Re: AtomAPI Implementation, Mark Pilgrim, 08/18/2003
Atom API problem: PHP can't deal with Atom-Authenticate headers, Simon Willison, 08/18/2003
Re: AtomAPI Implementation, Ken MacLeod, 08/18/2003
Re: 0.2, do we *really* need multipart/alternative?, Ken MacLeod, 08/18/2003
AtomAPI Implementation, Joe Gregorio, 08/18/2003
RE: 0.2 question re content of <content>, Simon Fell, 08/18/2003
RE: 0.2 question re content of <content>, Danny Ayers, 08/18/2003
0.2, do we *really* need multipart/alternative?, Tim Bray, 08/18/2003
Re: Atom 0.2 feedback, Ken MacLeod, 08/18/2003
0.2 question re content of <content>, Tim Bray, 08/18/2003
Re: Atom 0.2 feedback, Joe English, 08/18/2003
Re: xml:lang attribute, Bill Kearney, 08/18/2003
Atom 0.2 feedback, Tim Bray, 08/17/2003
Re: xml:lang attribute, Sam Ruby, 08/17/2003
RE: xml:lang attribute, Ziv Caspi, 08/17/2003
Re: xml:lang attribute, Evan Martin, 08/16/2003
Re: xml:lang attribute, Maciej Ceglowski, 08/16/2003
Re: xml:lang attribute, Anatoly Vorobey, 08/16/2003
Re: xml:lang attribute, Bill Kearney, 08/16/2003
Re: OSCOM Hackathon/Sprint at Seybold, Michael Wechner, 08/15/2003
Re: xml:lang attribute, Evan Martin, 08/15/2003
Re: xml:lang attribute, Maciej Cegłowski, 08/15/2003
Re: xml:lang attribute, Bill Kearney, 08/15/2003
Re: xml:lang attribute, Maciej Cegłowski, 08/15/2003
Re: xml:lang attribute, Evan Martin, 08/15/2003
Re: xml:lang attribute, Bill Kearney, 08/15/2003
Re: xml:lang attribute, Maciej Cegłowski, 08/15/2003
RE: xml:lang attribute, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 08/15/2003
OSCOM Hackathon/Sprint at Seybold, Michael Wechner, 08/13/2003
Re: xml:lang attribute, Maciej Cegłowski, 08/13/2003
RE : Versioning and Namespaces (was Re: Atom and RDF), Laurent Le Meur, 08/13/2003
Re: "Noindex" marker on feeds?, Maciej Ceglowski, 08/13/2003
RE: Atom and RDF, Danny Ayers, 08/13/2003
Re: external content [was Re: Bandwidth concerns], Misha Dynin, 08/13/2003
Re: "Noindex" marker on feeds?, Misha Dynin, 08/13/2003
Re: Atom and RDF, Joe English, 08/12/2003
Re: Atom and RDF, Sam Ruby, 08/12/2003
Re: Atom and RDF, Joe English, 08/12/2003
Re: Atom and RDF, Tim Bray, 08/12/2003
RE: Versioning and Namespaces (was Re: Atom and RDF), Shelley Powers, 08/12/2003
Re: external content [was Re: Bandwidth concerns], Bill Kearney, 08/12/2003
Re: "Noindex" marker on feeds?, Mark Pilgrim, 08/12/2003
Re: "Noindex" marker on feeds?, Misha Dynin, 08/12/2003
Re: external content [was Re: Bandwidth concerns], Misha Dynin, 08/12/2003
Re: Versioning and Namespaces (was Re: Atom and RDF), Sam Ruby, 08/12/2003
external content [was Re: Bandwidth concerns], Evan Martin, 08/12/2003
Re: Versioning and Namespaces (was Re: Atom and RDF), Dare Obasanjo, 08/12/2003
Re: Versioning and Namespaces (was Re: Atom and RDF), Maciej Cegłowski, 08/12/2003
IRC Channel for Pie/Atom/Echo (was: Re: RDF and Managability), Sean B. Palmer, 08/12/2003
Re: Versioning and Namespaces (was Re: Atom and RDF), Sam Ruby, 08/12/2003
RE: Bandwidth concerns, Jeremy Gray, 08/12/2003
Re: Versioning and Namespaces, Sean B. Palmer, 08/12/2003
Re: xml:lang attribute, Arve Bersvendsen, 08/12/2003
RE: RDF and Managability, Shelley Powers, 08/12/2003
Versioning and Namespaces (was Re: Atom and RDF), Dare Obasanjo, 08/12/2003
Re: CSS, Bill Kearney, 08/12/2003
Re: CSS, Phil Wolff, 08/12/2003
Re: Atom and RDF, Sean B. Palmer, 08/12/2003
Re: Bandwidth concerns, Bill Kearney, 08/12/2003
RDF and Managability, Sean B. Palmer, 08/12/2003
Re: Bandwidth concerns, Phil Wolff, 08/12/2003
Re: Atom and RDF, Rick Thomas, 08/12/2003
Re: Atom and RDF, Dare Obasanjo, 08/12/2003
Re: Bandwidth concerns, Maciej Cegłowski, 08/12/2003
Re: Bandwidth concerns, Bill Kearney, 08/12/2003
Re: Atom and RDF, Sean B. Palmer, 08/12/2003
Re: Atom and RDF, Graham Parks, 08/12/2003
Re: Atom and RDF, Sean B. Palmer, 08/12/2003
RE: Atom and RDF, Danny Ayers, 08/12/2003
Re: Atom and RDF, Dare Obasanjo, 08/11/2003
RE: Semantics permathread (was Re: Categories for atom?), Dare Obasanjo, 08/11/2003
Re: Atom and RDF, Tim Bray, 08/11/2003
RE: Atom and RDF, Shelley Powers, 08/11/2003
Re: Bandwidth concerns, Allen Firstenberg, 08/11/2003
RE: Atom and RDF, Danny Ayers, 08/11/2003
RE: Atom and RDF, Shelley Powers, 08/11/2003
Re: Atom and RDF, Sam Ruby, 08/11/2003
Re: Atom and RDF, Tim Bray, 08/11/2003
Re: Atom and RDF, Tim Bray, 08/11/2003
RE: Semantics permathread (was Re: Categories for atom?), Joe Madia, 08/11/2003
Re: Atom and RDF, Dare Obasanjo, 08/11/2003
RE: Semantics permathread (was Re: Categories for atom?), Dare Obasanjo, 08/11/2003
RE: Semantics permathread (was Re: Categories for atom?), Nelson Minar, 08/11/2003
RE: Semantics permathread (was Re: Categories for atom?), Danny Ayers, 08/11/2003
Re: Semantics permathread (was Re: Categories for atom?), Graham Parks, 08/11/2003
Re: Semantics permathread (was Re: Categories for atom?), Joe English, 08/11/2003
RE: Semantics permathread (was Re: Categories for atom?), Danny Ayers, 08/11/2003
RE: Semantics permathread (was Re: Categories for atom?), Shelley Powers, 08/11/2003
Re: Atom and RDF, Mark Pilgrim, 08/11/2003
Re: Semantics permathread (was Re: Categories for atom?), Maciej Cegłowski, 08/11/2003
Re: Semantics permathread (was Re: Categories for atom?), Mark Pilgrim, 08/11/2003
RE: Semantics permathread (was Re: Categories for atom?), Danny Ayers, 08/11/2003
RE: Atom and RDF, Shelley Powers, 08/11/2003
RE: Semantics permathread (was Re: Categories for atom?), Shelley Powers, 08/11/2003
RE: Atom and RDF, Danny Ayers, 08/11/2003
Re: Semantics permathread (was Re: Categories for atom?), Mark Pilgrim, 08/11/2003
RE: Semantics permathread (was Re: Categories for atom?), Danny Ayers, 08/11/2003
RE: Atom and RDF, Dare Obasanjo, 08/11/2003
RE: Semantics permathread (was Re: Categories for atom?), Shelley Powers, 08/11/2003
RE: created, issued, modified [Re: comments on Atom 0.2], Jeremy Gray, 08/11/2003
RE: Atom and RDF, Danny Ayers, 08/11/2003
Semantics permathread (was Re: Categories for atom?), Mark Pilgrim, 08/11/2003
RE: "Noindex" marker on feeds?, Danny Ayers, 08/11/2003
RE: Atom and RDF, Dare Obasanjo, 08/11/2003
RE: Atom and RDF, Shelley Powers, 08/11/2003
RE: Atom and RDF, Dare Obasanjo, 08/11/2003
"Noindex" marker on feeds?, Maciej Cegłowski, 08/11/2003
Re: Yuck, John Beimler, 08/11/2003
Re: Bandwidth concerns, Nelson Minar, 08/11/2003
Re: [rss] Re: Bandwidth concerns, Bill Kearney, 08/11/2003
RE: Atom and RDF, Shelley Powers, 08/11/2003
Re: [rss] Re: Bandwidth concerns, Allen Firstenberg, 08/11/2003
Atom and RDF, Joe Gregorio, 08/11/2003
Re: Bandwidth concerns, Duncan Wilcox, 08/11/2003
Re: Bandwidth concerns, Bill Kearney, 08/11/2003
Yuck, Sam Ruby, 08/11/2003
Bandwidth concerns, Duncan Wilcox, 08/11/2003
RE: Categories for atom?, Danny Ayers, 08/11/2003
Re: Categories for atom?, Mark Pilgrim, 08/10/2003
Categories for atom?, James Robertson, 08/10/2003
Re: Service discovery formats, Sam Ruby, 08/10/2003
RE: namespace qualifications, Dare Obasanjo, 08/10/2003
RE: Service discovery formats, Dare Obasanjo, 08/10/2003
RE: Service discovery formats, Danny Ayers, 08/10/2003
Re: We can't use RSD, Bill Kearney, 08/10/2003
Re: Service discovery formats, Nelson Minar, 08/10/2003
Re: comments on Atom 0.2, Dirk Haun, 08/10/2003
RE: We can't use RSD, Danny Ayers, 08/10/2003
Re: We don't need RSD, Sam Ruby, 08/10/2003
RE: We can't use RSD, Daniel Berlinger, 08/10/2003
RE: We can't use RSD, Danny Ayers, 08/10/2003
Service discovery formats, Danny Ayers, 08/10/2003
RE: We can't use RSD, Danny Ayers, 08/10/2003
RE: We can't use RSD, Daniel Berlinger, 08/09/2003
Re: We can't use RSD, Daniel Berlinger, 08/09/2003
RE: Authentication, Nelson Minar, 08/09/2003
RE: Authentication, Joe Madia, 08/09/2003
Re: created, issued, modified [Re: comments on Atom 0.2], Joe Gregorio, 08/09/2003
Re: created, issued, modified [Re: comments on Atom 0.2], Evan Martin, 08/09/2003
RE: We can't use RSD, Danny Ayers, 08/09/2003
RE: We don't need RSD, Danny Ayers, 08/09/2003
We can't use RSD, Mark Pilgrim, 08/09/2003
Re: We don't need RSD, Mark Pilgrim, 08/09/2003
Re: created, issued, modified [Re: comments on Atom 0.2], Bill Kearney, 08/09/2003
[no subject], Scott Watermasysk, 08/09/2003
RE: A question regarding multiple content, Jeremy Gray, 08/09/2003
RE: created, issued, modified [Re: comments on Atom 0.2], Jeremy Gray, 08/09/2003
RE: namespace qualifications, Danny Ayers, 08/09/2003
RE: Authentication, Danny Ayers, 08/09/2003
Re: Authentication, Gary F, 08/09/2003
Re: namespace qualifications, Sjoerd Visscher, 08/09/2003
Re: We don't need RSD, Sjoerd Visscher, 08/09/2003

Page 43 of 44
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.