Archive of atom-syntax, by date

• Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Mark Nottingham, 07/02/2009
• Re: [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-03], Nikunj R. Mehta, 07/01/2009
• Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Geoffrey Sneddon, 07/01/2009
• [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-03], Colm Divilly, 07/01/2009
• Re: link relations and links in general, Erik Wilde, 07/01/2009
• Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Colm Divilly, 07/01/2009
• Re: link relations and links in general, Subbu Allamaraju, 06/30/2009
• Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Mark Nottingham, 06/30/2009
• Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Lisa Dusseault, 06/30/2009
• Re: link relations and links in general, Erik Wilde, 06/30/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-01, Peter Keane, 06/30/2009
• Re: link relations and links in general, Subbu Allamaraju, 06/29/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-01, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/29/2009
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-01, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/29/2009
• extension for update properties, Erik Wilde, 06/29/2009
• Re: link relations and links in general, Erik Wilde, 06/28/2009
• Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Colm Divilly, 06/25/2009
• Re: New WG for Atom? (was Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00), Kyle Marvin, 06/24/2009
• Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Colm Divilly, 06/18/2009
• Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, ASAKURA Hiroshi, 06/17/2009
• Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Mark Nottingham, 06/16/2009
• Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Geoffrey Sneddon, 06/16/2009
• Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Peter Krantz, 06/16/2009
• Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Niklas Lindström, 06/16/2009
• Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Peter Saint-Andre, 06/16/2009
• Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Mark Nottingham, 06/16/2009
• Re: Profile Media Type Extension, Julian Reschke, 06/13/2009
• Profile Media Type Extension, James M Snell, 06/12/2009
• Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Colm Divilly, 06/12/2009
• Re: I-D Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-00.txt, Julian Reschke, 06/12/2009
• RE: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Lindsley Brett-ABL001, 06/12/2009
• Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Julian Reschke, 06/12/2009
• Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 06/11/2009
• Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, John Panzer, 06/11/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-02, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/11/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-02, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/11/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-02, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/11/2009
• Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Jan Algermissen, 06/11/2009
• Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, Erik Wilde, 06/11/2009
• Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/11/2009
• Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, jasnell, 06/11/2009
• Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Joe Gregorio, 06/11/2009
• Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 06/11/2009
• Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, John Panzer, 06/11/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-02, jasnell, 06/11/2009
• Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, Thomas Broyer, 06/11/2009
• Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, Ross Singer, 06/11/2009
• Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, Thomas Broyer, 06/11/2009
• RE: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-02, Davis_Cornelia, 06/10/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-00, jasnell, 06/10/2009
• Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, Ross Singer, 06/10/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-02, Hadrien Gardeur, 06/10/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/10/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-00, James M Snell, 06/10/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/10/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-00, James M Snell, 06/10/2009
• Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Al Brown, 06/10/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/10/2009
• Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Jan Algermissen, 06/10/2009
• Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/10/2009
• Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Al Brown, 06/10/2009
• Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Al Brown, 06/10/2009
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-00, Martin Atkins, 06/10/2009
• Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/10/2009
• Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, James M Snell, 06/10/2009
• Re: Atom Tombstones Draft Revitalized, jasnell, 06/10/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-02, jasnell, 06/10/2009
• Re: Atompub Features Draft Dead for Good?, Al Brown, 06/10/2009
• Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/10/2009
• Re: Atom Tombstones Draft Revitalized, Peter Keane, 06/10/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-02, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/10/2009
• Re: Linking Atom Entries to 'Category Feeds', jasnell, 06/10/2009
• Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Al Brown, 06/10/2009
• Re: Atom Tombstones Draft Revitalized, James M Snell, 06/10/2009
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-02, James M Snell, 06/10/2009
• Re: Atom Tombstones Draft Revitalized, Niklas Lindström, 06/10/2009
• Linking Atom Entries to 'Category Feeds', Colm Divilly, 06/10/2009
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-02, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/10/2009
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/10/2009
• Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, Peter Krantz, 06/10/2009
• Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, Erik Wilde, 06/09/2009
• Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, Martin Atkins, 06/09/2009
• Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/09/2009
• Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, Erik Wilde, 06/09/2009
• Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, Peter Krantz, 06/09/2009
• Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/09/2009
• Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, James M Snell, 06/09/2009
• Re: Inlining link target content (was: Exploring a new WG around Atom), Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/09/2009
• Inlining link target content (was: Exploring a new WG around Atom), Martin Atkins, 06/09/2009
• Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/09/2009
• Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 06/09/2009
• Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 06/09/2009
• Sub-typing Atom documents, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/09/2009
• Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Martin Atkins, 06/09/2009
• RE: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Myles, Stuart, 06/09/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Peter Keane, 06/08/2009
• Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
• Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Peter Keane, 06/08/2009
• Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Erik Wilde, 06/08/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, jasnell, 06/08/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/08/2009
• Re: Atompub Features Draft Dead for Good?, jasnell, 06/08/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Al Brown, 06/08/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 06/08/2009
• Re: Atompub Features Draft Dead for Good?, Al Brown, 06/08/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/08/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/08/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Al Brown, 06/08/2009
• Atom Tombstones Draft Revitalized, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/08/2009
• Atompub Features Draft Dead for Good?, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Al Brown, 06/08/2009
• Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Peter Saint-Andre, 06/08/2009
• Re: Comments on hierarchy draft, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/08/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/08/2009
• Re: Comments on hierarchy draft, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
• Exploring a new WG around Atom, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/08/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
• Re: Comments on hierarchy draft, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/08/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/08/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/08/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
• Atom bidi draft revitalized, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Hadrien Gardeur, 06/08/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Al Brown, 06/08/2009
• Re: New WG for Atom? (was Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00), James M Snell, 06/08/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/08/2009
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
• Comments on hierarchy draft, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Kyle Marvin, 06/05/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Mark Nottingham, 06/05/2009
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Al Brown, 06/05/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/05/2009
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/05/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Kyle Marvin, 06/05/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Kyle Marvin, 06/05/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Mark Nottingham, 06/04/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Peter Keane, 06/04/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Mark Nottingham, 06/04/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/04/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Mark Nottingham, 06/04/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/04/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/04/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/04/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Kyle Marvin, 06/04/2009
• RE: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Al Brown, 06/03/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Jan Algermissen, 06/03/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Mark Nottingham, 06/03/2009
• RE: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Pablo Castro, 06/03/2009
• Re: Recap - call for preferences/discussion - Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Al Brown, 06/03/2009
• Re: New WG for Atom? (was Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00), Julian Reschke, 06/03/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/03/2009
• New WG for Atom? (was Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00), Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/03/2009
• Re: Recap - call for preferences/discussion - Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/03/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Julian Reschke, 06/03/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/03/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Peter Keane, 06/02/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Mark Nottingham, 06/02/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Peter Keane, 06/02/2009
• Re: CMIS Folders & categories (was: Recap - call for preferences/discussion - Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00), Peter Keane, 06/02/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Mark Nottingham, 06/02/2009
• Re: Recap - call for preferences/discussion - Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Al Brown, 06/02/2009
• Re: CMIS Folders & categories, Al Brown, 06/02/2009
• Re: CMIS Folders & categories, Bill de hOra, 06/02/2009
• Re: Recap - call for preferences/discussion - Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/02/2009
• Re: CMIS Folders & categories (was: Recap - call for preferences/discussion - Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00), Al Brown, 06/02/2009
• Re: Recap - call for preferences/discussion - Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Al Brown, 06/02/2009
• Re: Recap - call for preferences/discussion - Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/02/2009
• Re: Recap - call for preferences/discussion - Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Peter Keane, 06/02/2009
• Recap - call for preferences/discussion - Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Al Brown, 06/02/2009
• Re: atom:category excludes atom:* children?, Nikunj R. Mehta, 05/28/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 05/28/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 05/28/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 05/28/2009
• Re: Hierarchy ID draft, Nikunj R. Mehta, 05/27/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Al Brown, 05/27/2009
• Re: atom:category excludes atom:* children?, Al Brown, 05/27/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Al Brown, 05/27/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Julian Reschke, 05/27/2009
• Re: atom:category excludes atom:* children?, Nikunj Mehta, 05/26/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 05/26/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 05/26/2009
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Julian Reschke, 05/25/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Julian Reschke, 05/25/2009
• Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), Geoffrey Sneddon, 05/24/2009
• Multilingual Atom Feeds, Alexis Georges, 05/21/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 05/20/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 05/20/2009
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Peter Keane, 05/20/2009
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 05/20/2009
• atom and atompub errata, Erik Wilde, 05/15/2009
• RE: format of atom:link/@type, Brian Smith, 05/15/2009
• Re: format of atom:link/@type, Erik Wilde, 05/15/2009
• Re: link relations and links in general, Erik Wilde, 05/15/2009
• Re: format of atom:link/@type, jasnell, 05/15/2009
• Re: format of atom:link/@type, Richard Salz, 05/15/2009
• Re: format of atom:link/@type, Julian Reschke, 05/15/2009
• Re: format of atom:link/@type, Richard Salz, 05/15/2009
• RE: format of atom:link/@type, Brian Smith, 05/15/2009
• format of atom:link/@type, Julian Reschke, 05/15/2009
• Re: link relations and links in general, Hadrien Gardeur, 05/15/2009
• Re: link relations and links in general, Julian Reschke, 05/15/2009
• Re: link relations and links in general, Hadrien Gardeur, 05/14/2009
• Re: link relations and links in general, Nikunj Mehta, 05/14/2009
• Re: link relations and links in general, Nikunj Mehta, 05/14/2009
• Re: link relations and links in general, Erik Wilde, 05/14/2009
• link relations and links in general, Erik Wilde, 05/14/2009
• Re: Proliferation of rel values for atom:link, Peter Keane, 05/13/2009
• Re: Proliferation of rel values for atom:link, Nikunj Mehta, 05/13/2009
• Re: Proliferation of rel values for atom:link, Martin Atkins, 05/13/2009
• Re: Proliferation of rel values for atom:link, Nikunj Mehta, 05/13/2009
• Re: Proliferation of rel values for atom:link, Julian Reschke, 05/13/2009
• Re: Proliferation of rel values for atom:link, Nikunj Mehta, 05/13/2009
• Proliferation of rel values for atom:link, Nikunj Mehta, 05/13/2009
• Re: Hierarchy / Containment, Nikunj Mehta, 05/13/2009
• Re: Hierarchy / Containment, Julian Reschke, 05/13/2009
• Re: Hierarchy / Containment, Nikunj Mehta, 05/12/2009
• Hierarchy / Containment, Julian Reschke, 05/12/2009
• Re: Best current practice for collection discovery, Hadrien Gardeur, 05/11/2009
• Re: Best current practice for collection discovery, Nikunj Mehta, 05/11/2009
• Re: Best current practice for collection discovery, James M Snell, 05/11/2009
• Re: Best current practice for collection discovery, Peter Keane, 05/10/2009
• Best current practice for collection discovery, Nikunj Mehta, 05/08/2009
• Re: [cmis-comment] Comments on CMIS link relations, Mark Nottingham, 05/05/2009
• Re: Comments on CMIS link relations, Mark Nottingham, 05/05/2009
• Re: atom feeds as sitemaps, Erik Wilde, 05/01/2009
• atom feeds as sitemaps, Ed Summers, 05/01/2009
• Comments on CMIS link relations, Mark Nottingham, 04/30/2009
• Re: Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums, Peter Krantz, 04/24/2009
• Re: Should AtomPub allow app:categories in workspace?, Eric Scheid, 04/16/2009
• Re: Should AtomPub allow app:categories in workspace?, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 04/15/2009
• Should AtomPub allow app:categories in workspace?, Ian Mayo, 04/14/2009
• Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links, Mark Nottingham, 04/07/2009
• FW: [link draft] Changing the model for links, Brian Smith, 04/07/2009
• Fwd: [link draft] Changing the model for links, Mark Nottingham, 04/07/2009
• Re: Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums, Mark Nottingham, 04/06/2009
• Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), Peter Keane, 04/04/2009
• Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), Peter Keane, 04/04/2009
• Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), James Holderness, 04/04/2009
• Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), Geoffrey Sneddon, 04/04/2009
• Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), John Panzer, 03/28/2009
• Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), Peter Keane, 03/28/2009
• Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), Peter Keane, 03/28/2009
• Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), James Holderness, 03/28/2009
• Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), Peter Keane, 03/27/2009
• Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), James Holderness, 03/27/2009
• Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), Peter Keane, 03/26/2009
• Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), Geoffrey Sneddon, 03/26/2009
• Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), John Panzer, 03/25/2009
• draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), Geoffrey Sneddon, 03/25/2009
• AtomSite 0.9 Released, fully utilizing Atom extensibility, Jarrett Vance, 03/20/2009
• Re: linking atom entries, Aristotle Pagaltzis, 03/12/2009
• linking atom entries, Peter Keane, 03/10/2009
• Re: feed autodiscovery, Mark Nottingham, 03/01/2009
• Re: feed autodiscovery, Jan Algermissen, 03/01/2009
• Re: feed autodiscovery, Erik Wilde, 03/01/2009
• Re: feed autodiscovery, Peter Keane, 03/01/2009
• Re: feed autodiscovery, Aristotle Pagaltzis, 03/01/2009
• Re: feed autodiscovery, Erik Wilde, 03/01/2009
• Re: feed autodiscovery, Aristotle Pagaltzis, 03/01/2009
• Re: feed autodiscovery, Erik Wilde, 02/26/2009
• RE: feed autodiscovery, Joe Cheng, 02/26/2009
• feed autodiscovery, Erik Wilde, 02/25/2009
• Re: Resources for Atom beginners, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 02/23/2009
• Re: Resources for Atom beginners, Erik Wilde, 02/22/2009
• Resources for Atom beginners, Peter Keane, 02/22/2009
• Re: feedsets and atom:source, Erik Wilde, 02/19/2009
• Re: Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums, James Holderness, 02/19/2009
• Link Extensions I-D (was Re: Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums), Niklas Lindström, 02/19/2009
• Re: Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums, Niklas Lindström, 02/19/2009
• Re: Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums, James M Snell, 02/18/2009
• Re: Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums, James Holderness, 02/18/2009
• Re: Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums, James M Snell, 02/18/2009
• Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums, Niklas Lindström, 02/18/2009
• Re: feedsets and atom:source, Richard Salz, 02/18/2009
• Re: feedsets and atom:source, Peter Keane, 02/18/2009
• Re: feedsets and atom:source, Bob Wyman, 02/18/2009
• Re: feedsets and atom:source, Peter Keane, 02/18/2009
• RE: feedsets and atom:source, Lindsley Brett-ABL001, 02/18/2009
• Re: feedsets and atom:source, Bob Wyman, 02/17/2009
• Re: feedsets and atom:source, James Holderness, 02/17/2009
• Re: feedsets and atom:source, Erik Wilde, 02/17/2009
• Re: feedsets and atom:source, James Holderness, 02/17/2009
• Re: feedsets and atom:source, Eric Scheid, 02/16/2009
• Re: feedsets and atom:source, Erik Wilde, 02/16/2009
• Re: feedsets and atom:source, Aristotle Pagaltzis, 02/16/2009
• Re: Link relation registry request for "describedby", Asbjørn Ulsberg, 02/16/2009
• Re: feedsets and atom:source, Erik Wilde, 02/16/2009
• Re: feedsets and atom:source, Thomas Broyer, 02/16/2009
• Re: Question about sorting in Atom, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 02/10/2009
• Question about sorting in Atom, Peter Keane, 02/07/2009
• Re: Link relation registry request for "describedby", Julian Reschke, 02/06/2009
• Link relation registry request for "describedby", Lisa Dusseault, 02/06/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/03/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Nikunj Mehta, 02/03/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Keith Fahlgren, 02/03/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Nikunj Mehta, 02/03/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Nikunj Mehta, 02/03/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/03/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Keith Fahlgren, 02/03/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Nikunj Mehta, 02/03/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], James M Snell, 02/03/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/03/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/03/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Julian Reschke, 02/03/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/03/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], James M Snell, 02/03/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/03/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], James M Snell, 02/03/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Julian Reschke, 02/03/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/03/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], James M Snell, 02/03/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/03/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], James M Snell, 02/03/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/03/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Eric Scheid, 02/02/2009
• Re: Fwd: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/02/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/02/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], James Holderness, 02/02/2009
• Re: Fwd: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Bill de hOra, 02/02/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Eric Scheid, 02/02/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Thomas Broyer, 02/02/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], James Holderness, 02/02/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/02/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Eric Scheid, 02/02/2009
• Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Eric Scheid, 02/02/2009
• Re: Fwd: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Julian Reschke, 02/02/2009
• Re: Fwd: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/02/2009
• Re: Fwd: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Julian Reschke, 02/02/2009
• Re: Fwd: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/02/2009
• Fwd: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Lisa Dusseault, 02/02/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published"and"time this entry was added to this feed", James Holderness, 01/20/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and"time this entry was added to this feed", Stephane Bortzmeyer, 01/20/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Eric Scheid, 01/18/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Peter Keane, 01/18/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Eric Scheid, 01/17/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Peter Keane, 01/17/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Bill de hOra, 01/16/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and"time this entry was added to this feed", Sylvain Hellegouarch, 01/16/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and"time this entry was added to this feed", James Holderness, 01/15/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and"time this entry was added to this feed", James M Snell, 01/15/2009
• RE: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and"time this entry was added to this feed", Dare Obasanjo, 01/15/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and"time this entry was added to this feed", James Holderness, 01/15/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Martin Atkins, 01/13/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Peter Keane, 01/13/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", James M Snell, 01/13/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Bill de hOra, 01/13/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Bill de hOra, 01/13/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Bill de hOra, 01/13/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and"time this entry was added to this feed", Martin Atkins, 01/13/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and"time this entry was added to this feed", James Holderness, 01/13/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Martin Atkins, 01/13/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Aristotle Pagaltzis, 01/13/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Martin Atkins, 01/13/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Aristotle Pagaltzis, 01/13/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Aristotle Pagaltzis, 01/13/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Antone Roundy, 01/12/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Martin Atkins, 01/12/2009
• RE: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Dare Obasanjo, 01/12/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Martin Atkins, 01/12/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", James Holderness, 01/12/2009
• RE: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams, Dare Obasanjo, 01/11/2009
• Re: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams, Martin Atkins, 01/11/2009
• Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Peter Keane, 01/11/2009
• The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Martin Atkins, 01/11/2009
• Re: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams, Martin Atkins, 01/11/2009
• RE: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams, Dare Obasanjo, 01/09/2009
• Re: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams, Bill de hOra, 01/08/2009
• Re: Is atom:content *the* place to put content?, James Holderness, 01/08/2009
• RE: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams, Dare Obasanjo, 01/08/2009
• Re: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams, Martin Atkins, 01/08/2009
• Re: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams, Bill de hOra, 01/08/2009
• Re: Is atom:content *the* place to put content?, Bill de hOra, 01/08/2009
• Re: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams, Bill de hOra, 01/08/2009
• Re: Is atom:content *the* place to put content?, Tim Bray, 01/08/2009
• Re: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams, Martin Atkins, 01/08/2009
• RE: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams, Dare Obasanjo, 01/08/2009
• Re: Is atom:content *the* place to put content?, James Holderness, 01/07/2009
• Re: Is atom:content *the* place to put content?, Aristotle Pagaltzis, 01/07/2009
• Re: Is atom:content *the* place to put content?, James M Snell, 01/06/2009
• Re: Is atom:content *the* place to put content?, Martin Atkins, 01/06/2009
• Is atom:content *the* place to put content?, Richard Salz, 01/06/2009
• Re: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams, James Holderness, 01/03/2009
• Re: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams, Martin Atkins, 01/02/2009
• Re: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams, James Holderness, 01/02/2009
• Re: link relationship registration, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 01/01/2009
• Re: Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams, Mark Nottingham, 01/01/2009
• Some Draft Atom-related Specs for Activity Streams, Martin Atkins, 01/01/2009
• Re: Encapsulating Atom Entries In An SMTP Message, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 12/24/2008
• Re: multiple values in atom:link@rel, Julian Reschke, 12/19/2008
• RE: multiple values in atom:link@rel, Brian Smith, 12/19/2008
• multiple values in atom:link@rel, Peter Keane, 12/19/2008
• Encapsulating Atom Entries In An SMTP Message, Lindsley Brett-ABL001, 12/17/2008
• Re: Weather data in Atom, Bill de hOra, 12/16/2008
• Re: Query re: support of Media RSS extensions inside Atom feeds, Sam Ruby, 12/14/2008
• Re: Weather data in Atom, Ian Mayo, 12/13/2008
• Re: Weather data in Atom, Aristotle Pagaltzis, 12/12/2008
• Re: Weather data in Atom, Sean Gillies, 12/11/2008
• Weather data in Atom, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 12/11/2008
• Re: link relationship registration, Mark Nottingham, 12/10/2008
• Re: link relationship registration, Henri Sivonen, 12/10/2008
• Re: link relationship registration, Henri Sivonen, 12/10/2008
• Re: link relationship registration, Mark Nottingham, 12/10/2008
• Re: link relationship registration, Anne van Kesteren, 12/10/2008
• Re: link relationship registration, Phil Archer, 12/10/2008
• Re: link relationship registration, Anne van Kesteren, 12/10/2008
• Re: link relationship registration, Mark Nottingham, 12/10/2008
• Re: link relationship registration, Anne van Kesteren, 12/10/2008
• Re: link relationship registration [was: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03], Phil Archer, 12/10/2008
• Re: link relationship registration, Mark Nottingham, 12/10/2008
• Re: link relationship registration [was: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03], Mark Nottingham, 12/10/2008
• Re: link relationship registration, Anne van Kesteren, 12/10/2008
• Re: link relationship registration [was: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03], Phil Archer, 12/10/2008
• Re: link relationship registration [was: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03], Mark Nottingham, 12/10/2008
• Re: link relationship registration [was: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03], Julian Reschke, 12/10/2008
• Re: link relationship registration [was: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03], Mark Nottingham, 12/09/2008
• Re: text in atom:category?, Peter Keane, 12/08/2008
• Re: text in atom:category?, Eric Scheid, 12/08/2008
• Re: text in atom:category?, Peter Keane, 12/08/2008
• Re: Geotagging Atom feeds?, James M Snell, 12/08/2008
• Re: text in atom:category?, Eric Scheid, 12/08/2008
• Re: text in atom:category?, Eric Scheid, 12/08/2008
• Re: text in atom:category?, Bill de hOra, 12/08/2008
• Re: text in atom:category?, Peter Keane, 12/08/2008
• Re: text in atom:category?, Eric Scheid, 12/08/2008
• Re: Geotagging Atom feeds?, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 12/08/2008
• Re: Geotagging Atom feeds?, DeWitt Clinton, 12/08/2008
• Re: Geotagging Atom feeds?, Ian Mayo, 12/08/2008
• Re: text in atom:category?, Peter Keane, 12/08/2008
• Re: text in atom:category?, Peter Keane, 12/08/2008
• Re: text in atom:category?, Aristotle Pagaltzis, 12/07/2008
• Re: text in atom:category?, Eric Scheid, 12/07/2008
• text in atom:category?, Peter Keane, 12/07/2008
• Re: Geotagging Atom feeds?, James Holderness, 12/07/2008
• Re: Geotagging Atom feeds?, Sean Gillies, 12/07/2008
• Re: Geotagging Atom feeds?, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 12/07/2008
• Geotagging Atom feeds?, Tim Bray, 12/07/2008
• Re: Relating Atom Resources w/ Category & Link, James M Snell, 12/04/2008
• Re: Relating Atom Resources w/ Category & Link, Aristotle Pagaltzis, 12/04/2008
• Re: Relating Atom Resources w/ Category & Link, Peter Keane, 12/03/2008
• Re: Relating Atom Resources w/ Category & Link, Nikunj Mehta, 12/03/2008
• Re: Relating Atom Resources w/ Category & Link, Nikunj Mehta, 12/03/2008
• Relating Atom Resources w/ Category & Link, Peter Keane, 12/03/2008
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03, Julian Reschke, 12/02/2008
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03, Teo Hui Ming, 12/01/2008
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03, Mark Nottingham, 12/01/2008
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03, Paul Denning, 12/01/2008
• Feedback on draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03, was: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03, Julian Reschke, 12/01/2008
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03, Mark Nottingham, 11/30/2008
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03, Mark Nottingham, 11/30/2008
• Re: Feed diff, Thomas Broyer, 11/14/2008
• Re: Feed diff, Felix Sasaki, 11/14/2008
• Re: Feed diff, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 11/14/2008
• Feed diff, Davis_Cornelia, 11/13/2008
• Re: draft-divilly-atompub-hierarchy-00, Peter Keane, 11/04/2008
• Re: draft-divilly-atompub-hierarchy-00, Colm Divilly, 11/04/2008
• Re: draft-divilly-atompub-hierarchy-00, Nikunj Mehta, 11/04/2008
• Re: draft-divilly-atompub-hierarchy-00, Peter Keane, 11/04/2008
• RE: draft-divilly-atompub-hierarchy-00, Brian Smith, 11/03/2008
• Re: draft-divilly-atompub-hierarchy-00, Nikunj Mehta, 11/03/2008
• Re: draft-divilly-atompub-hierarchy-00, Peter Keane, 10/31/2008
• RE: draft-divilly-atompub-hierarchy-00, Brian Smith, 10/31/2008
• draft-divilly-atompub-hierarchy-00, Nikunj Mehta, 10/31/2008
• RE: [ANN] Restlet 1.1 released with better Atom syntax support, Jerome Louvel, 10/31/2008
• Re: [ANN] Restlet 1.1 released with better Atom syntax support, Thomas Broyer, 10/31/2008
• [ANN] Restlet 1.1 released with better Atom syntax support, Jerome Louvel, 10/31/2008
• Re: Atom simple metadata extension, Peter Keane, 10/14/2008
• RE: Atom simple metadata extension, Brian Smith, 10/13/2008
• Atom simple metadata extension, Peter Keane, 10/13/2008
• thoughts/opinions about Yahoo's SearchMonkey?, Peter Keane, 10/12/2008
• Re: Fw: link rel="search", DeWitt Clinton, 10/09/2008
• Re: Exporting a blog using Atom, Aristotle Pagaltzis, 10/09/2008
• Fw: link rel="search", Pete Brunet, 10/09/2008
• RE: Exporting a blog using Atom, Brian Smith, 10/09/2008
• Exporting a blog using Atom, Andrew da Silva, 10/06/2008
• Conflict between the AtomPub multipart/related and composite content proposals, Brian Smith, 10/01/2008
• Re: Atom link relations request [IANA #189665], James M Snell, 09/29/2008
• Re: Atom link relations request [IANA #189665], Peter Keane, 09/28/2008
• Re: Atom link relations request [IANA #189665], James Holderness, 09/28/2008
• Re: Atom link relations request [IANA #189665], Peter Keane, 09/27/2008
• Fwd: Atom link relations request [IANA #189665], Lisa Dusseault, 09/24/2008
• RE: Validation of multiple atom:category elements, role of schemas in Atom validation., Sylvain Hellegouarch, 09/23/2008
• Re: Validation of multiple atom:category elements, role of schemas in Atom validation., Aristotle Pagaltzis, 09/22/2008
• Re: A simple proposal for message/* and multipart/* content in Atom, Aristotle Pagaltzis, 09/22/2008
• Re: A simple proposal for message/* and multipart/* content in Atom, Thomas Broyer, 09/22/2008
• A simple proposal for message/* and multipart/* content in Atom, Brian Smith, 09/22/2008
• RE: Validation of multiple atom:category elements, role of schemas in Atom validation., Brian Smith, 09/22/2008
• Re: Validation of multiple atom:category elements, role of schemas in Atom validation., Sylvain Hellegouarch, 09/22/2008
• Re: Validation of multiple atom:category elements, role of schemas in Atom validation., Sylvain Hellegouarch, 09/22/2008
• RE: Validation of multiple atom:category elements, role of schemas in Atom validation., Brian Smith, 09/22/2008
• RE: Validation of multiple atom:category elements, role of schemas in Atom validation., Sylvain Hellegouarch, 09/22/2008
• RE: Validation of multiple atom:category elements, role of schemas in Atom validation., Brian Smith, 09/22/2008
• Re: Validation of multiple atom:category elements, role of schemas in Atom validation., James Abley, 09/22/2008
• Validation of multiple atom:category elements, role of schemas in Atom validation., Ian Mayo, 09/22/2008
• Re: Proposal to register rel="about", Erling Wegger Linde, 09/21/2008
• Re: atom:link rel="printer-friendly" ??, Ross Singer, 09/19/2008

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.