Archive of atom-syntax, by date

Go to thread index
Go to main page for atom-syntax

Page 1 of 43
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

Fwd: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham, 01/27/2010
Feel go.od now!, Murray Morales, 01/27/2010
Re: I-D Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-07.txt, Julian Reschke, 01/22/2010
Re: I-D Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-06.txt, Julian Reschke, 01/12/2010
Re: Last Call: draft-brown-versioning-link-relations (Link Relations for Simple Version Navigation) to Informational RFC, Julian Reschke, 12/15/2009
Re: I-D Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-05.txt, Julian Reschke, 12/11/2009
Re: Media Attributes For Links, Mo McRoberts, 12/10/2009
RE: Media Attributes For Links, Lindsley Brett-ABL001, 12/10/2009
Re: Majordomo results: unsubscribe, Rafik Dammak, 12/10/2009
Re: Media Attributes For Links, Mo McRoberts, 12/10/2009
Re: Media Attributes For Links, Dmitri Popov, 12/10/2009
Re: I-D Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-05.txt, Geoffrey M Clemm, 12/09/2009
Re: I-D Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-05.txt, Jan Algermissen, 12/09/2009
Media Attributes For Links, Lindsley Brett-ABL001, 12/08/2009
Re: I-D Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-05.txt, Julian Reschke, 12/07/2009
Re: I-D Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-04.txt, Julian Reschke, 12/05/2009
Re: (Opposite of working-copy?) Comment on draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Julian Reschke, 12/04/2009
Fwd: draft-nottingham-http-link-relation-07 progress, Mark Nottingham, 12/02/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Julian Reschke, 12/02/2009
Re: (Opposite of working-copy?) Comment on draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Al Brown, 12/02/2009
Re: (Opposite of working-copy?) Comment on draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Julian Reschke, 12/02/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Julian Reschke, 12/02/2009
(Opposite of working-copy?) Comment on draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Jan Algermissen, 12/02/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Jan Algermissen, 12/01/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 12/01/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Julian Reschke, 12/01/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Julian Reschke, 12/01/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Jan Algermissen, 11/30/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Geoffrey M Clemm, 11/30/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Julian Reschke, 11/30/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Jan Algermissen, 11/30/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Julian Reschke, 11/30/2009
Re: Can atom-namespaced elements be allowed as foreign markup?, Peter Keane, 11/29/2009
Can atom-namespaced elements be allowed as foreign markup?, John Panzer, 11/29/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Jan Algermissen, 11/28/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Jan Algermissen, 11/27/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Julian Reschke, 11/27/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Julian Reschke, 11/26/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Jan Algermissen, 11/26/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Jan Algermissen, 11/26/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Jan Algermissen, 11/26/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Julian Reschke, 11/26/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Julian Reschke, 11/26/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Jan Algermissen, 11/26/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Sam Johnston, 11/26/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Julian Reschke, 11/26/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Julian Reschke, 11/26/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Jan Algermissen, 11/26/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Julian Reschke, 11/26/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Sam Johnston, 11/24/2009
Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Julian Reschke, 11/24/2009
Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Jan Algermissen, 11/24/2009
last-calling I-D Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03, Julian Reschke, 11/20/2009
Re: I-D Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-02.txt, Julian Reschke, 11/19/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Bill de hOra, 11/12/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Sam Johnston, 11/12/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Richard Salz, 11/12/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Bill de hOra, 11/12/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Sam Johnston, 11/12/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Joe Gregorio, 11/11/2009
FYI Salmon protocol built on top of Atom + extensions, John Panzer, 10/29/2009
Re: Atom Tombstones Draft Revitalized, Peter Krantz, 10/20/2009
Re: Atom Tombstones Draft Revitalized, jasnell, 10/20/2009
Social Web Camp, Santa Clara Nov 2nd, Story Henry, 10/18/2009
Re: atom:feedset proposal, James Holderness, 10/18/2009
Re: atom:feedset proposal, Sam Johnston, 10/18/2009
Ranking extension status, Philippe Converset, 10/16/2009
Re: atom:feedset proposal, Mo McRoberts, 10/15/2009
Re: atom:feedset proposal, James Holderness, 10/15/2009
Re: atom:feedset proposal, Mo McRoberts, 10/15/2009
Re: atom:feedset proposal, Peter Keane, 10/15/2009
Re: atom:feedset proposal, Mo McRoberts, 10/15/2009
Re: atom:feedset proposal, Martin Atkins, 10/15/2009
atom:feedset proposal, Mo McRoberts, 10/15/2009
Re: atom:icon/logo in atom:entry, Sam Johnston, 10/01/2009
atom:icon/logo in atom:entry, Antonio Tapiador del Dujo, 10/01/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Mark Nottingham, 09/26/2009
IETF patent policy, Lisa Dusseault, 09/25/2009
Re: Atom Tombstones Draft Revitalized, Ed Summers, 09/21/2009
Re: Atom Tombstones Draft Revitalized, Bob Wyman, 09/21/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation [ w/ proposed modifications to link draft ], Robert Sayre, 09/21/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Sam Johnston, 09/21/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Mark Nottingham, 09/21/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation [ w/ proposed modifications to link draft ], Mark Nottingham, 09/20/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation [ w/ proposed modifications to link draft ], Robert Sayre, 09/20/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation [ w/ proposed modifications to link draft ], Sam Johnston, 09/20/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation [ w/ proposed modifications to link draft ], Robert Sayre, 09/20/2009
Re: [pubsubhubbub] Re: Input on request for link relation, Martin Atkins, 09/18/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation [ w/ proposed modifications to link draft ], John Panzer, 09/17/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Sam Johnston, 09/17/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Mark Nottingham, 09/16/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation [ w/ proposed modifications to link draft ], Mark Nottingham, 09/16/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Sam Johnston, 09/16/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Sam Johnston, 09/16/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Mark Nottingham, 09/15/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Mark Nottingham, 09/15/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, John Panzer, 09/11/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Adam Roach, 09/11/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Peter Saint-Andre, 09/11/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Sam Johnston, 09/11/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Peter Saint-Andre, 09/11/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Peter Saint-Andre, 09/11/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Hadrien Gardeur, 09/11/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Sam Johnston, 09/11/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Julian Reschke, 09/11/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Hadrien Gardeur, 09/11/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Sam Johnston, 09/11/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Jan Algermissen, 09/10/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, John Panzer, 09/10/2009
Re: Input on request for link relation, Jan Algermissen, 09/10/2009
Input on request for link relation, Lisa Dusseault, 09/10/2009
Re: Link Relations: up/down vs parent/child vs ancestor/descendant etc., Nikunj R. Mehta, 09/09/2009
Link Relations: up/down vs parent/child vs ancestor/descendant etc., Sam Johnston, 09/08/2009
Re: link/@type and content negotiation, Erik Wilde, 09/07/2009
Re: Atom Versioning, James Holderness, 09/07/2009
Re: Atom Versioning, Aristotle Pagaltzis, 09/07/2009
Re: Atom Versioning, Jan Algermissen, 09/07/2009
Re: Atom Versioning, Aristotle Pagaltzis, 09/05/2009
Re: link/@type and content negotiation, Peter Keane, 09/04/2009
link/@type and content negotiation, Erik Wilde, 09/04/2009
Atom Versioning, Jan Algermissen, 09/01/2009
Re: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard, Julian Reschke, 08/31/2009
Extensions for link (slug), Niklas Lindström, 08/21/2009
New I-D on " Advanced Security Processing for Atom and APP Documents", Richard Salz, 08/11/2009
Re: Atom Bar BoF in Stockholm, Julian Reschke, 07/29/2009
Re: Atom Bar BoF in Stockholm, Lisa Dusseault, 07/26/2009
Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Mark Nottingham, 07/22/2009
Atom Bar BoF in Stockholm, Mark Nottingham, 07/21/2009
Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Colm Divilly, 07/20/2009
Fwd: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham, 07/15/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-01, Nikunj R. Mehta, 07/15/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-01, Mark Nottingham, 07/15/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-01, Nikunj R. Mehta, 07/15/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-01, Mark Nottingham, 07/14/2009
Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Mark Nottingham, 07/14/2009
Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Erik Wilde, 07/14/2009
Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Colm Divilly, 07/14/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-01, Nikunj R. Mehta, 07/13/2009
update properties of versioned entries, Erik Wilde, 07/13/2009
Re: extension for update properties, Erik Wilde, 07/13/2009
Re: extension for update properties, Martin Atkins, 07/13/2009
Re: extension for update properties, Keith Fahlgren, 07/13/2009
Re: I-D Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-01.txt, Julian Reschke, 07/13/2009
Re: extension for update properties, James Abley, 07/13/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-01, Mark Nottingham, 07/12/2009
RE: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-01, Davis_Cornelia, 07/12/2009
Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Mark Nottingham, 07/12/2009
Re: Profile Media Type Extension, Mark Nottingham, 07/12/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-01, Mark Nottingham, 07/12/2009
Re: extension for update properties, Erik Wilde, 07/12/2009
Re: extension for update properties, Mark Nottingham, 07/12/2009
Re: Atom Tombstones Draft Revitalized, Mark Nottingham, 07/08/2009
Re: extension for update properties, Erik Wilde, 07/07/2009
Re: extension for update properties, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 07/06/2009
Re: extension for update properties, James Abley, 07/06/2009
Re: extension for update properties, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 07/06/2009
Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Mark Nottingham, 07/02/2009
Re: [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-03], Nikunj R. Mehta, 07/01/2009
Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Geoffrey Sneddon, 07/01/2009
[Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-03], Colm Divilly, 07/01/2009
Re: link relations and links in general, Erik Wilde, 07/01/2009
Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Colm Divilly, 07/01/2009
Re: link relations and links in general, Subbu Allamaraju, 06/30/2009
Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Mark Nottingham, 06/30/2009
Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Lisa Dusseault, 06/30/2009
Re: link relations and links in general, Erik Wilde, 06/30/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-01, Peter Keane, 06/30/2009
Re: link relations and links in general, Subbu Allamaraju, 06/29/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-01, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/29/2009
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-01, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/29/2009
extension for update properties, Erik Wilde, 06/29/2009
Re: link relations and links in general, Erik Wilde, 06/28/2009
Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Colm Divilly, 06/25/2009
Re: New WG for Atom? (was Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00), Kyle Marvin, 06/24/2009
Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Colm Divilly, 06/18/2009
Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, ASAKURA Hiroshi, 06/17/2009
Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Mark Nottingham, 06/16/2009
Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Geoffrey Sneddon, 06/16/2009
Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Peter Krantz, 06/16/2009
Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Niklas Lindström, 06/16/2009
Re: Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Peter Saint-Andre, 06/16/2009
Talking about Atom in Stockholm, Mark Nottingham, 06/16/2009
Re: Profile Media Type Extension, Julian Reschke, 06/13/2009
Profile Media Type Extension, James M Snell, 06/12/2009
Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Colm Divilly, 06/12/2009
Re: I-D Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-00.txt, Julian Reschke, 06/12/2009
RE: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Lindsley Brett-ABL001, 06/12/2009
Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Julian Reschke, 06/12/2009
Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 06/11/2009
Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, John Panzer, 06/11/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-02, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/11/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-02, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/11/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-02, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/11/2009
Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Jan Algermissen, 06/11/2009
Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, Erik Wilde, 06/11/2009
Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/11/2009
Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, jasnell, 06/11/2009
Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Joe Gregorio, 06/11/2009
Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 06/11/2009
Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, John Panzer, 06/11/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-02, jasnell, 06/11/2009
Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, Thomas Broyer, 06/11/2009
Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, Ross Singer, 06/11/2009
Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, Thomas Broyer, 06/11/2009
RE: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-02, Davis_Cornelia, 06/10/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-00, jasnell, 06/10/2009
Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, Ross Singer, 06/10/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-02, Hadrien Gardeur, 06/10/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/10/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-00, James M Snell, 06/10/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/10/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-00, James M Snell, 06/10/2009
Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Al Brown, 06/10/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/10/2009
Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Jan Algermissen, 06/10/2009
Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/10/2009
Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Al Brown, 06/10/2009
Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Al Brown, 06/10/2009
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-00, Martin Atkins, 06/10/2009
Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/10/2009
Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, James M Snell, 06/10/2009
Re: Atom Tombstones Draft Revitalized, jasnell, 06/10/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-02, jasnell, 06/10/2009
Re: Atompub Features Draft Dead for Good?, Al Brown, 06/10/2009
Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/10/2009
Re: Atom Tombstones Draft Revitalized, Peter Keane, 06/10/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-02, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/10/2009
Re: Linking Atom Entries to 'Category Feeds', jasnell, 06/10/2009
Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Al Brown, 06/10/2009
Re: Atom Tombstones Draft Revitalized, James M Snell, 06/10/2009
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-02, James M Snell, 06/10/2009
Re: Atom Tombstones Draft Revitalized, Niklas Lindström, 06/10/2009
Linking Atom Entries to 'Category Feeds', Colm Divilly, 06/10/2009
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-02, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/10/2009
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mehta-atom-inline-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/10/2009
Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, Peter Krantz, 06/10/2009
Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, Erik Wilde, 06/09/2009
Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, Martin Atkins, 06/09/2009
Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/09/2009
Re: Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, Erik Wilde, 06/09/2009
Tools not supporting atom:content with @src ?, Peter Krantz, 06/09/2009
Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/09/2009
Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, James M Snell, 06/09/2009
Re: Inlining link target content (was: Exploring a new WG around Atom), Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/09/2009
Inlining link target content (was: Exploring a new WG around Atom), Martin Atkins, 06/09/2009
Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/09/2009
Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 06/09/2009
Re: Sub-typing Atom documents, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 06/09/2009
Sub-typing Atom documents, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/09/2009
Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Martin Atkins, 06/09/2009
RE: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Myles, Stuart, 06/09/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Peter Keane, 06/08/2009
Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Peter Keane, 06/08/2009
Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Erik Wilde, 06/08/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, jasnell, 06/08/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/08/2009
Re: Atompub Features Draft Dead for Good?, jasnell, 06/08/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Al Brown, 06/08/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 06/08/2009
Re: Atompub Features Draft Dead for Good?, Al Brown, 06/08/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/08/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/08/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Al Brown, 06/08/2009
Atom Tombstones Draft Revitalized, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/08/2009
Atompub Features Draft Dead for Good?, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Al Brown, 06/08/2009
Re: Exploring a new WG around Atom, Peter Saint-Andre, 06/08/2009
Re: Comments on hierarchy draft, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/08/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/08/2009
Re: Comments on hierarchy draft, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
Exploring a new WG around Atom, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/08/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
Re: Comments on hierarchy draft, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/08/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/08/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/08/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
Atom bidi draft revitalized, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Hadrien Gardeur, 06/08/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Al Brown, 06/08/2009
Re: New WG for Atom? (was Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00), James M Snell, 06/08/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/08/2009
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
Comments on hierarchy draft, James M Snell, 06/08/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Kyle Marvin, 06/05/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Mark Nottingham, 06/05/2009
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Al Brown, 06/05/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/05/2009
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-01, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/05/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Kyle Marvin, 06/05/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Kyle Marvin, 06/05/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Mark Nottingham, 06/04/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Peter Keane, 06/04/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Mark Nottingham, 06/04/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/04/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Mark Nottingham, 06/04/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/04/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/04/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/04/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Kyle Marvin, 06/04/2009
RE: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Al Brown, 06/03/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Jan Algermissen, 06/03/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Mark Nottingham, 06/03/2009
RE: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Pablo Castro, 06/03/2009
Re: Recap - call for preferences/discussion - Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Al Brown, 06/03/2009
Re: New WG for Atom? (was Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00), Julian Reschke, 06/03/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/03/2009
New WG for Atom? (was Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00), Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/03/2009
Re: Recap - call for preferences/discussion - Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/03/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Julian Reschke, 06/03/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/03/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Peter Keane, 06/02/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Mark Nottingham, 06/02/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Peter Keane, 06/02/2009
Re: CMIS Folders & categories (was: Recap - call for preferences/discussion - Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00), Peter Keane, 06/02/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Mark Nottingham, 06/02/2009
Re: Recap - call for preferences/discussion - Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Al Brown, 06/02/2009
Re: CMIS Folders & categories, Al Brown, 06/02/2009
Re: CMIS Folders & categories, Bill de hOra, 06/02/2009
Re: Recap - call for preferences/discussion - Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/02/2009
Re: CMIS Folders & categories (was: Recap - call for preferences/discussion - Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00), Al Brown, 06/02/2009
Re: Recap - call for preferences/discussion - Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Al Brown, 06/02/2009
Re: Recap - call for preferences/discussion - Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 06/02/2009
Re: Recap - call for preferences/discussion - Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Peter Keane, 06/02/2009
Recap - call for preferences/discussion - Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Al Brown, 06/02/2009
Re: atom:category excludes atom:* children?, Nikunj R. Mehta, 05/28/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 05/28/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 05/28/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 05/28/2009
Re: Hierarchy ID draft, Nikunj R. Mehta, 05/27/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Al Brown, 05/27/2009
Re: atom:category excludes atom:* children?, Al Brown, 05/27/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Al Brown, 05/27/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Julian Reschke, 05/27/2009
Re: atom:category excludes atom:* children?, Nikunj Mehta, 05/26/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 05/26/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 05/26/2009
Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Julian Reschke, 05/25/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Julian Reschke, 05/25/2009
Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), Geoffrey Sneddon, 05/24/2009
Multilingual Atom Feeds, Alexis Georges, 05/21/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 05/20/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 05/20/2009
Re: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Peter Keane, 05/20/2009
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-divilly-atom-hierarchy-00, Nikunj R. Mehta, 05/20/2009
atom and atompub errata, Erik Wilde, 05/15/2009
RE: format of atom:link/@type, Brian Smith, 05/15/2009
Re: format of atom:link/@type, Erik Wilde, 05/15/2009
Re: link relations and links in general, Erik Wilde, 05/15/2009
Re: format of atom:link/@type, jasnell, 05/15/2009
Re: format of atom:link/@type, Richard Salz, 05/15/2009
Re: format of atom:link/@type, Julian Reschke, 05/15/2009
Re: format of atom:link/@type, Richard Salz, 05/15/2009
RE: format of atom:link/@type, Brian Smith, 05/15/2009
format of atom:link/@type, Julian Reschke, 05/15/2009
Re: link relations and links in general, Hadrien Gardeur, 05/15/2009
Re: link relations and links in general, Julian Reschke, 05/15/2009
Re: link relations and links in general, Hadrien Gardeur, 05/14/2009
Re: link relations and links in general, Nikunj Mehta, 05/14/2009
Re: link relations and links in general, Nikunj Mehta, 05/14/2009
Re: link relations and links in general, Erik Wilde, 05/14/2009
link relations and links in general, Erik Wilde, 05/14/2009
Re: Proliferation of rel values for atom:link, Peter Keane, 05/13/2009
Re: Proliferation of rel values for atom:link, Nikunj Mehta, 05/13/2009
Re: Proliferation of rel values for atom:link, Martin Atkins, 05/13/2009
Re: Proliferation of rel values for atom:link, Nikunj Mehta, 05/13/2009
Re: Proliferation of rel values for atom:link, Julian Reschke, 05/13/2009
Re: Proliferation of rel values for atom:link, Nikunj Mehta, 05/13/2009
Proliferation of rel values for atom:link, Nikunj Mehta, 05/13/2009
Re: Hierarchy / Containment, Nikunj Mehta, 05/13/2009
Re: Hierarchy / Containment, Julian Reschke, 05/13/2009
Re: Hierarchy / Containment, Nikunj Mehta, 05/12/2009
Hierarchy / Containment, Julian Reschke, 05/12/2009
Re: Best current practice for collection discovery, Hadrien Gardeur, 05/11/2009
Re: Best current practice for collection discovery, Nikunj Mehta, 05/11/2009
Re: Best current practice for collection discovery, James M Snell, 05/11/2009
Re: Best current practice for collection discovery, Peter Keane, 05/10/2009
Best current practice for collection discovery, Nikunj Mehta, 05/08/2009
Re: [cmis-comment] Comments on CMIS link relations, Mark Nottingham, 05/05/2009
Re: Comments on CMIS link relations, Mark Nottingham, 05/05/2009
Re: atom feeds as sitemaps, Erik Wilde, 05/01/2009
atom feeds as sitemaps, Ed Summers, 05/01/2009
Comments on CMIS link relations, Mark Nottingham, 04/30/2009
Re: Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums, Peter Krantz, 04/24/2009
Re: Should AtomPub allow app:categories in workspace?, Eric Scheid, 04/16/2009
Re: Should AtomPub allow app:categories in workspace?, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 04/15/2009
Should AtomPub allow app:categories in workspace?, Ian Mayo, 04/14/2009
Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links, Mark Nottingham, 04/07/2009
FW: [link draft] Changing the model for links, Brian Smith, 04/07/2009
Fwd: [link draft] Changing the model for links, Mark Nottingham, 04/07/2009
Re: Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums, Mark Nottingham, 04/06/2009
Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), Peter Keane, 04/04/2009
Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), Peter Keane, 04/04/2009
Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), James Holderness, 04/04/2009
Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), Geoffrey Sneddon, 04/04/2009
Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), John Panzer, 03/28/2009
Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), Peter Keane, 03/28/2009
Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), Peter Keane, 03/28/2009
Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), James Holderness, 03/28/2009
Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), Peter Keane, 03/27/2009
Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), James Holderness, 03/27/2009
Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), Peter Keane, 03/26/2009
Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), Geoffrey Sneddon, 03/26/2009
Re: draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), John Panzer, 03/25/2009
draft-sneddon-atom-export (Was: Exporting a blog using Atom), Geoffrey Sneddon, 03/25/2009
AtomSite 0.9 Released, fully utilizing Atom extensibility, Jarrett Vance, 03/20/2009
Re: linking atom entries, Aristotle Pagaltzis, 03/12/2009
linking atom entries, Peter Keane, 03/10/2009
Re: feed autodiscovery, Mark Nottingham, 03/01/2009
Re: feed autodiscovery, Jan Algermissen, 03/01/2009
Re: feed autodiscovery, Erik Wilde, 03/01/2009
Re: feed autodiscovery, Peter Keane, 03/01/2009
Re: feed autodiscovery, Aristotle Pagaltzis, 03/01/2009
Re: feed autodiscovery, Erik Wilde, 03/01/2009
Re: feed autodiscovery, Aristotle Pagaltzis, 03/01/2009
Re: feed autodiscovery, Erik Wilde, 02/26/2009
RE: feed autodiscovery, Joe Cheng, 02/26/2009
feed autodiscovery, Erik Wilde, 02/25/2009
Re: Resources for Atom beginners, Asbjørn Ulsberg, 02/23/2009
Re: Resources for Atom beginners, Erik Wilde, 02/22/2009
Resources for Atom beginners, Peter Keane, 02/22/2009
Re: feedsets and atom:source, Erik Wilde, 02/19/2009
Re: Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums, James Holderness, 02/19/2009
Link Extensions I-D (was Re: Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums), Niklas Lindström, 02/19/2009
Re: Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums, Niklas Lindström, 02/19/2009
Re: Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums, James M Snell, 02/18/2009
Re: Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums, James Holderness, 02/18/2009
Re: Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums, James M Snell, 02/18/2009
Using I-D:s for tombstones and checksums, Niklas Lindström, 02/18/2009
Re: feedsets and atom:source, Richard Salz, 02/18/2009
Re: feedsets and atom:source, Peter Keane, 02/18/2009
Re: feedsets and atom:source, Bob Wyman, 02/18/2009
Re: feedsets and atom:source, Peter Keane, 02/18/2009
RE: feedsets and atom:source, Lindsley Brett-ABL001, 02/18/2009
Re: feedsets and atom:source, Bob Wyman, 02/17/2009
Re: feedsets and atom:source, James Holderness, 02/17/2009
Re: feedsets and atom:source, Erik Wilde, 02/17/2009
Re: feedsets and atom:source, James Holderness, 02/17/2009
Re: feedsets and atom:source, Eric Scheid, 02/16/2009
Re: feedsets and atom:source, Erik Wilde, 02/16/2009
Re: feedsets and atom:source, Aristotle Pagaltzis, 02/16/2009
Re: Link relation registry request for "describedby", Asbjørn Ulsberg, 02/16/2009
Re: feedsets and atom:source, Erik Wilde, 02/16/2009
Re: feedsets and atom:source, Thomas Broyer, 02/16/2009
Re: Question about sorting in Atom, Sylvain Hellegouarch, 02/10/2009
Question about sorting in Atom, Peter Keane, 02/07/2009
Re: Link relation registry request for "describedby", Julian Reschke, 02/06/2009
Link relation registry request for "describedby", Lisa Dusseault, 02/06/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/03/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Nikunj Mehta, 02/03/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Keith Fahlgren, 02/03/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Nikunj Mehta, 02/03/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Nikunj Mehta, 02/03/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/03/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Keith Fahlgren, 02/03/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Nikunj Mehta, 02/03/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], James M Snell, 02/03/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/03/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/03/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Julian Reschke, 02/03/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/03/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], James M Snell, 02/03/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/03/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], James M Snell, 02/03/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Julian Reschke, 02/03/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/03/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], James M Snell, 02/03/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/03/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], James M Snell, 02/03/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/03/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Eric Scheid, 02/02/2009
Re: Fwd: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/02/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/02/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], James Holderness, 02/02/2009
Re: Fwd: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Bill de hOra, 02/02/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Eric Scheid, 02/02/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Thomas Broyer, 02/02/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], James Holderness, 02/02/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/02/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Eric Scheid, 02/02/2009
Re: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Eric Scheid, 02/02/2009
Re: Fwd: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Julian Reschke, 02/02/2009
Re: Fwd: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/02/2009
Re: Fwd: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Julian Reschke, 02/02/2009
Re: Fwd: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Richard Salz, 02/02/2009
Fwd: Management Item: Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057], Lisa Dusseault, 02/02/2009
Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published"and"time this entry was added to this feed", James Holderness, 01/20/2009
Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and"time this entry was added to this feed", Stephane Bortzmeyer, 01/20/2009
Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Eric Scheid, 01/18/2009
Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Peter Keane, 01/18/2009
Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Eric Scheid, 01/17/2009
Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Peter Keane, 01/17/2009
Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and "time this entry was added to this feed", Bill de hOra, 01/16/2009
Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and"time this entry was added to this feed", Sylvain Hellegouarch, 01/16/2009
Re: The distinction between "time this entry was published" and"time this entry was added to this feed", James Holderness, 01/15/2009

Page 1 of 43
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.