[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: URI space specification?

To: "Tim Bray" <tbray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Michael Wechner" <michael.wechner@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: URI space specification?
From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 18:19:47 +0200
Cc: <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: <danny666@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx


> > has anyone started yet with a URI space specification, e.g.
> >
> > Entries:   ..../year/month/day/entryid/index.html
> >
> > Feed:      ...../feedid/index.html
>
> Is it a good idea to standardize this?  Different publications will have
> different needs.

Any examples?

I don't know about standardising as such, but guidelines for blog tools
might well help with
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/BlogMigration

Cheers,
Danny.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: URI space specification?
  - From: Michael Wechner

References:
- Re: URI space specification?
  - From: Tim Bray

Prev by Date: Re: URI space specification?
Next by Date: Re: URI space specification?
Previous by thread: Re: URI space specification?
Next by thread: Re: URI space specification?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread