[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: comments on Atom 0.2

To: Nelson Minar <nelson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: comments on Atom 0.2
From: Evan Martin <martine@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 23:23:23 -0700
Cc: atom-syntax@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:22:20AM -0700, Nelson Minar wrote:
> <entry> elements seem too wordy. <id> is redundant with <link> in
> Blosxom. I don't see why I need two timestamps (<issued>, <modified>),
> identical except for timezone. Recommendation: make <issued> and <id>
> optional (if <id> is missing, substiute <link>). 

If I post in PST but don't tag it with <issued>, then the only date the
blog tool has is the modified date, which is in UTC.  How would it know
the proper timezone to translate that date into when showing the date
you posted with?  Or do you mean to have your entries show up dated with
UTC dates?

-- 
Evan Martin
martine@xxxxxxxxx
http://neugierig.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: comments on Atom 0.2
  - From: Nelson Minar

References:
- comments on Atom 0.2
  - From: Nelson Minar

Prev by Date: RSD ( was Re: draft-gregorio-07.html)
Next by Date: test - please ignore
Previous by thread: comments on Atom 0.2
Next by thread: Re: comments on Atom 0.2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread