[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-gregorio-07.html

To: Daniel Berlinger <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: draft-gregorio-07.html
From: Gary F <solitude@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 12:59:34 +0100
Cc: atom-syntax@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030616 Thunderbird/0.1a

Daniel Berlinger wrote:

Want to flatten the field again Joe? Pull the Introspection section from the RFC, with a "To Be Decided" and then let's see where things stand.

Yuck.

d.

Suggestion: If you want this to be public and for everyone to reach consensus one way or the other, why not start a page on the wiki for it? I can't see any such page at the moment, and it's unlikely that anyone will vote one way or the other without a page. http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/IntrospectionVsRsd would seem like a good place to do it.

References:
- Re: draft-gregorio-07.html
  - From: Daniel Berlinger

Prev by Date: test - please ignore
Next by Date: Re: comments on Atom 0.2
Previous by thread: Re: draft-gregorio-07.html
Next by thread: Re: draft-gregorio-07.html
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread