[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Authentication

To: atom-syntax@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Authentication
From: Ziv Caspi <zivca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 10:06:07 +0200
Cc: "'Simon Fell'" <SFell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

[I reply in plain rather than HTML to accommodate HTML-challenged mail
clients]

Simon Fell wrote:

>>>
  I see no reason to specify anything more than use HTTP's existing options
for authentication, confidentiality and tamper proofing as required. With
perhaps something that points out guidelines and/or best practices.
<<<

+1

We have sufficient food on our plate as it is. Let's leverage existing
solutions for authentication etc. 

Ziv Caspi
  cell: +972-53-668-751
    web: http://radio.weblogs.com/0106548/

References:
- Re: Authentication
  - From: Simon Fell

Prev by Date: We don't need RSD
Next by Date: RE: We don't need RSD
Previous by thread: Re: Authentication
Next by thread: RE: Authentication
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread