[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: We don't need RSD

To: "Mark Pilgrim" <f8dy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: We don't need RSD
From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 10:50:20 +0200
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: <danny666@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

I'd be very grateful if you could summarise your current thought on how we
should do it in the same manner as the list below.

Cheers,
Danny.

> 1. read HTML, find LINK tag to RSD
> 2. read RSD, find url of introspection file
> 3. read introspection file

Follow-Ups:
- Re: We don't need RSD
  - From: Mark Pilgrim

References:
- We don't need RSD
  - From: Mark Pilgrim

Prev by Date: RE: Authentication
Next by Date: Re: We don't need RSD
Previous by thread: We don't need RSD
Next by thread: Re: We don't need RSD
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread