Re: We don't need RSD

To: danny666@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: We don't need RSD
From: Mark Pilgrim <f8dy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 14:23:28 -0400
Cc: atom-syntax@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030718

I'd be very grateful if you could summarise your current thought on how we
should do it in the same manner as the list below.

1. read HTML, find LINK tag to RSD
2. read RSD, find url of introspection file
3. read introspection file

http://bitworking.org/rfc/draft-gregorio-07.html#rfc.section.5.1.1

Follow-Ups:
- Re: We don't need RSD
  - From: Sam Ruby
- RE: We don't need RSD
  - From: Danny Ayers