RE: We can't use RSD

[Daniel Berlinger <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Danny,

Can you please tell me where the "compromise" is?

d.

> 
> I'm sorry, this sounds as barmy as any conspiracy theory. There's nothing in
> Daniel Berlinger's posts to warrant such flaming, except perhaps the use of
> "yuck", which I must admit sets alarm bells ringing. However, I do agree
> with the conclusion, no RSD. I think the best approach is to write the
> introspection part of the spec based on the requirements, rather than
> compromise to what's already deployed. We don't need to use RSD.
> 
> Cheers,
> Danny.
>