[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Atom 0.2 feedback

To: Rodent of Unusual Size <Ken.Coar@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Atom 0.2 feedback
From: Joe Gregorio <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 12:50:50 -0400
Cc: atom-syntax@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312

Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:

i have just run some tests with vanilla apache and cgi...


Thanks Ken, this is great information. Mark and I will implement
this in the next release of the client and server code.

	Thanks again,
	-joe

--
http://BitWorking.org
http://WellFormedWeb.org

References:
- comments on Atom 0.2
  - From: Nelson Minar
- Atom 0.2 feedback
  - From: Tim Bray
- Re: Atom 0.2 feedback
  - From: Sam Ruby
- Re: Atom 0.2 feedback
  - From: Rodent of Unusual Size

Prev by Date: Re: Atom 0.2 feedback
Next by Date: Re: Will Atom have a "don't process invalid documents" rule?
Previous by thread: Re: Atom 0.2 feedback
Next by thread: Re: Atom 0.2 feedback
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread