Re: Escaped vs. inline content permathread (was Re: Atom 0.2 feedback)

[Graham Parks <dtcd@xxxxxxx>]

On Tuesday, August 19, 2003, at 10:11  pm, Mark Pilgrim wrote:

> Graham Parks wrote:
> > Slightly off-topic, and I guess I need to look it up on the wiki, but 
> > I thought most people were against inline markup? I can't think of a 
> > case where you wouldn't want all of the markup as a single string to 
> > pass to an HTML renderer, and it's hard to get back to that string 
> > after you've put it through the average XML parser. Where's the 
> > benefit here? Nothing's going to want to parse Atom and render the 
> > HTML in a single pass, is it?
>
> http://intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/EscapedHtmlDiscussion is the wiki 
> reference you're looking for.
>
> -Mark (who is preemptively killfiling this thread)

You're different from Dave Winer how?