[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom

To: "Aaron Swartz" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom
From: Maciej Ceglowski <mceglows@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 19:26:09 -0400
Cc: atom-syntax@xxxxxxx, "Morbus Iff" <morbus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, at 07:11 PM, Aaron Swartz wrote:

I agree that we should go ahead with Atom as the name.

yes, yes, yes, yes, yes

---

Maciej Ceglowski

Follow-Ups:
- RE: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom
  - From: Jeremy Gray

References:
- Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom
  - From: Aaron Swartz

Prev by Date: Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom
Next by Date: Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom
Previous by thread: Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom
Next by thread: RE: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread