[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom

To: <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom
From: "Jeremy Gray" <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 17:16:07 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

> On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, at 04:26 PM, Maciej Ceglowski wrote:
> 
> > On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, at 07:11 PM, Aaron Swartz wrote:
> > 
> > I agree that we should go ahead with Atom as the name.
> > 
> yes, yes, yes, yes, yes

Perhaps its time to dust off that shiny logo I whipped up back in the Wiki
days of old. :)

I haven't had much time to dedicate to the project in the last while, but I
definitely have enough time to say this: Reducing open issues is always
good. Let's solidify this one and move on.

Jeremy Gray

References:
- Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom
  - From: Maciej Ceglowski

Prev by Date: Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom
Next by Date: Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom
Previous by thread: Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom
Next by thread: Re: 'Atom' Should Be It's Name, and It's Name Was Atom
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread